Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr:93:264-267.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.050. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

Comparison of different samples for 2019 novel coronavirus detection by nucleic acid amplification tests

Affiliations

Comparison of different samples for 2019 novel coronavirus detection by nucleic acid amplification tests

Chunbao Xie et al. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

An ongoing outbreak of severe respiratory pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus has recently emerged in China. Here we report the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics of 19 suspect cases. We compared the positive ratio of 2019-nCoV nucleic acid amplification test results from different samples including oropharyngeal swab, blood, urine and stool with 3 different fluorescent RT-PCR kits. Nine out of the 19 patients had 2019-nCoV infection detected using oropharyngeal swab samples, and the virus nucleic acid was also detected in eight of these nine patients using stool samples. None of positive results was identified in the blood and urine samples. These three different kits got the same result for each sample and the positive ratio of nucleic acid detection for 2019-nCoV was only 47.4% in the suspect patients. Therefore, it is possible that infected patients have been missed by using nucleic acid detection only. It might be better to make a diagnosis combining the computed tomography scans and nucleic acid detection.

Keywords: 2019 Novel coronavirus pneumonia; Clinical diagnosis; Nucleic acid amplification test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CT scans of the 2019-nCoV nucleic acid–detected positive patients. Increasing and multifocal ground-glass changes were visible. (A) Patient 1, January 30, 2020 (hospital day 2, illness day 5, A-1); February 1, 2020 (hospital day 4, illness day 7, A-2). (B) Patient 2, January 30, 2020 (hospital day 2, illness day 5, B-1); February 1, 2020 (hospital day 4, illness day 7, B-2). (C) Patient 3, January 30, 2020 (hospital day 1, illness day 6, C-1); February 1, 2020 (hospital day 3, illness day 8, C-2). (D) Suspected case 1, January 31, 2020 (hospital day 1, illness day 4, D-1); February 1, 2020 (hospital day 6, illness day 9, D-2). (E) Suspected case 3, February 1, 2020 (hospital day 1, illness day 6, E-1); February 5, 2020 (hospital day 5, illness day 10, E-2). (F) Suspected case 4, January 31, 2020 (hospital day 1, illness day 2, F-1); February 1, 2020 (hospital day 4, illness day 5, F-2).

References

    1. Cui J., Li F., Shi Z.L. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17(3):181–192. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drosten C., Gunther S., Preiser W., van der Werf S., Brodt H.R., Becker S. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(20):1967–1976. - PubMed
    1. Fouchier R.A., Kuiken T., Schutten M., van Amerongen G., van Doornum G.J., van den Hoogen B.G. Aetiology: Koch’s postulates fulfilled for SARS virus. Nature. 2003;423(6937):240. - PMC - PubMed
    1. To K.K.W., Yip C.C.Y., Lai C.Y.W., Wong C.K.H., Ho D.T.Y., Pang P.K.P. Saliva as a diagnostic specimen for testing respiratory virus by a point-of-care molecular assay: a diagnostic validity study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(3):372–378. - PubMed
    1. Wang C., Horby P.W., Hayden F.G., Gao G.F. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):470–473. - PMC - PubMed