Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Apr 1:209:107939.
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107939. Epub 2020 Feb 22.

Comparison of timeline follow-back self-report and oral fluid testing to detect substance use in adult primary care patients

Courtney D Nordeck  1 , Jan Gryczynski  2 , Kevin E O'Grady  3 , Kathryn Polak  4 , Dace S Svikis  4 , Jennifer McNeely  5 , Li-Tzy Wu  6 , Robert P Schwartz  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of timeline follow-back self-report and oral fluid testing to detect substance use in adult primary care patients

Courtney D Nordeck et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. .

Abstract

Background: Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) interviews using self-report are often used to assess substance use. Oral fluid testing (OFT) offers an objective measure of substance use. There are limited data on the agreement between TLFB and OFT.

Methods: In this secondary analysis from a multisite study in five primary care sites, self-reported TLFB and OFT data collected under confidential conditions were compared to assess concordance (N=1799). OFT samples were analyzed for marijuana, heroin, cocaine, and non-medical use of prescription opioids. Demographic differences in discordance relative to TLFB and OFT concordant results for marijuana, the only substance with an adequate sample size in this analysis, were examined using multinomial logistic regression.

Results: Overall concordance rates between TLFB and OFT were 94.9 % or higher for each substance, driven by large subgroups with no use. Among participants with discordant use, marijuana was the only substance with lower detection on OFT than self-report (27.6 % OFT-positive only vs 32.2 % TLFB-positive only), whereas cocaine (65.6 % vs 8.6 %), prescription opioids (90.4 % vs 6.0 %), and heroin (40.7 % vs 26.0 %) all had higher detection via OFT than TLFB. Participants who reported marijuana use but had a negative OFT were more likely to be younger, Hispanic, and White compared to those with TLFB and OFT concordant positive results.

Conclusions: TLFB and OFT show disparate detection of different substances. Researchers should consider the implications of using either self-report or oral fluid testing in isolation, depending on the substance and collection setting. Triangulating multiple sources of information may improve detection of drug use.

Keywords: Concordance; Discordance; Illicit drug use; Oral fluid testing; Primary care; Self-Report; Timeline follow-back.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study Flow.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Allen KR 2011. Screening for drugs of abuse: Which matrix, oral fluid or urine? Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 48(6), 531–541. 10.1258/acb.2011.011116. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bell J 1998. Self report among injecting drug users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 51(3), 267–268. - PubMed
    1. Bosker WM, & Huestis MA 2009. Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse. Clinical Chemistry, 55(11), 1910–1931. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. 1997. A guide to substance abuse services for primary care clinicians. - PubMed
    1. Cone EJ 1993. Saliva testing for drugs of abuse. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 694(1), 91–127. - PubMed

Publication types