Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar;102-B(3):276-279.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1729.

Alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Affiliations
Review

Alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Sam Oussedik et al. Bone Joint J. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty is a well-documented phenomenon. Although many factors have been implicated, including modifiable and nonmodifiable patient factors, emphasis over the past decade has been on implant alignment and stability as both a cause of, and a solution to, this problem. Several alignment targets have evolved with a proliferation of techniques following the introduction of computer and robotic-assisted surgery. Mechanical alignment targets may achieve mechanically-sound alignment while ignoring the soft tissue envelope; kinematic alignment respects the soft tissue envelope while ignoring the mechanical environment. Functional alignment is proposed as a hybrid technique to allow mechanically-sound, soft tissue-friendly alignment targets to be identified and achieved. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):276-279.

Keywords: Alignment; Dissatisfaction; Kinematic alignment; Knee arthroplasty; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms