Birds rarely hybridize: A citizen science approach to estimating rates of hybridization in the wild
- PMID: 32115687
- DOI: 10.1111/evo.13943
Birds rarely hybridize: A citizen science approach to estimating rates of hybridization in the wild
Abstract
The rate of hybridization among taxa is a central consideration in any discussion of speciation, but rates of hybridization are difficult to estimate in most wild populations of animals. We used a successful citizen science dataset, eBird, to estimate the rates of hybridization for wild birds in the United States. We calculated the frequency at which hybrid individuals belonging to different species, families, and orders of birds were observed. Between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2018, a total of 334,770,194 species records were reported to eBird within the United States. Of this total, 212,875 or 0.064% were reported as hybrids. This estimate is higher than the rate of hybridization (0.00167%) reported by Mayr based on impressions from a career studying museum specimens. However, if the 10 most influential hybrid species are removed from the eBird dataset, the rate of hybridization decreases substantially to about 0.009%. We conclude that the rate of hybridization for individuals in most bird species is extremely low, even though the potential for birds to produce fertile offspring through hybrid crosses is high. These findings indicate that there is strong prezygotic selection working in most avian species.
Keywords: Aves; citizen science; eBird; hybridization; prezygotic selection; speciation.
© 2020 The Authors. Evolution © 2020 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Comment in
- 
  
  How common is avian hybridization on an individual level?Evolution. 2020 Jun;74(6):1228-1229. doi: 10.1111/evo.13985. Epub 2020 May 10. Evolution. 2020. PMID: 32359181
- 
  
  Estimating hybridization rates in the wild: Easier said than done?Evolution. 2021 Aug;75(8):2137-2144. doi: 10.1111/evo.14082. Epub 2021 Jul 6. Evolution. 2021. PMID: 32820532
- 
  
  A response to Justen et al. 2020: Estimating hybridization rates in the wild: Easier said than done?Evolution. 2021 Aug;75(8):2145-2147. doi: 10.1111/evo.14276. Epub 2021 Jul 6. Evolution. 2021. PMID: 34101832
- 
  
  A response to estimating hybridization in the wild using community science data: A path forward.Evolution. 2022 Feb;76(2):359-361. doi: 10.1111/evo.14390. Epub 2022 Jan 7. Evolution. 2022. PMID: 34705282
- 
  
  Estimating hybridization in the wild using citizen science data: A path forward.Evolution. 2022 Feb;76(2):362-372. doi: 10.1111/evo.14392. Epub 2022 Jan 7. Evolution. 2022. PMID: 34708408
References
LITERATURE CITED
- 
    - Abbott, R., D. Albach, S. Ansell, J. W. Arntzen, S. J. Baird, N. Bierne, J. Boughman, A. Brelsford, C. A. Buerkle, R. Buggs, et al. 2013. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 26:229-246.
 
- 
    - Aliabadian, M., V. Nijman, and E. M. Mccarthy. 2007. Avian hybrids: incidence and geographic distribution of hybridisation in birds. Contrib Zool. 76:59-61.
 
- 
    - Amadon, D., and L. L. Short. 2006. Treatment of subspecies approaching species status. Syst. Zool. 25:161-167.
 
- 
    - Bonney, R., C. B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, T. Phillips, K.V. Rosenberg, and J. Shirk. 2009. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience 59:977-984.
 
- 
    - Carling, M. D., and R.T. Brumfield. 2008. Haldane's rule in an avian system: using cline theory and divergence population genetics to test for differential introgression of mitochondrial, autosomal, and sex-linked loci across the Passerina bunting hybrid zone. Evolution 62:2600-2615.
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
