Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 11:10:993.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00993. eCollection 2019.

Ethical Issues in Online Psychotherapy: A Narrative Review

Julia Stoll  1 , Jonas Adrian Müller  1 , Manuel Trachsel  1
Affiliations
Review

Ethical Issues in Online Psychotherapy: A Narrative Review

Julia Stoll et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: The provision of psychotherapy over distance using technology is a growing market reaching many patients and therefore the risks and benefits need to be known by all psychotherapists whether they themselves practice online or not. This comprehensive review of the main ethical arguments for and against different forms of online psychotherapy aims to enhance discussion of ethical issues in this growing area.

Methods: A search of three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science) was conducted in August 2019 using a specific search protocol yielding 249 publications.

Results: Of 24 ethical arguments in favor of online psychotherapy and 32 against, the top five ethical arguments in favor of online psychotherapy were (1) increased access to psychotherapy and service availability and flexibility; (2) therapy benefits and enhanced communication; (3) advantages related to specific client characteristics (e.g. remote location); (4) convenience, satisfaction, acceptance, and increased demand; and (5) economic advantages. The top five ethical arguments against engagement in online psychotherapy were (1) privacy, confidentiality, and security issues; (2) therapist competence and need for special training; (3) communication issues specific to technology; (4) research gaps; and (5) emergency issues.

Conclusions: The findings may be of help to practitioners in deciding whether to engage in online psychotherapy, and in informing patients about risks and benefits, improving ethical guidelines, and stimulating further ethical discussion. The findings are argumentative and qualitative in nature, and further quantitative research is needed.

Keywords: ethics; online psychotherapy; technology; telepsychiatry; telepsychology.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chakrabarti S. Usefulness of telepsychiatry: A critical evaluation of videoconferencing-based approaches. World J Psychiatry (2015) 5(3):286–304. 10.5498/wjp.v5.i3.286 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joint Task Force for the Development of Telepsychology Guidelines for Psychologists (2013). Guidelines for the practice of telepsychology. Am Psychol 68(9):791–800. 10.1037/a0035001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cipolletta S, Mocellin D. Online counseling: An exploratory survey of Italian psychologists' attitudes towards new ways of interaction. Psychother Res (2017) 28:1–16. 10.1080/10503307.2016.1259533 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Comer JS. Introduction to the special series: Applying new technologies to extend the scope and accessibility of mental health care. Cogn Behav Pract (2015) 22(3):253–7. 10.1016/j.cbpra.2015.04.002 - DOI
    1. Coyle D, Doherty G, Matthews M, Sharry J. Computers in talk-based mental health interventions. Interact Comput (2007) 19(4):545–62. 10.1016/j.intcom.2007.02.001 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources