Forensic Outpatient Variables That May Help to Prevent Further Detention
- PMID: 32116857
- PMCID: PMC7031275
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00042
Forensic Outpatient Variables That May Help to Prevent Further Detention
Abstract
Background: Forensic outpatient treatment in Germany helps forensic patients back into society while managing the risk that these individuals present to public safety. Measures used to achieve this objective include ongoing psychiatric treatment and monitoring, case management, and controlling risk factors that may cause criminal behavior. In addition to the effects of treatment and control, good living conditions have been hypothesized to help prevent criminal recidivism and a number of studies have examined variables related to poor outcomes including recidivism among former prison inmates and sexual offenders. Yet, little is known about the predictive validity of certain candidate variables on the outcomes of German forensic outpatients.
Methods: In order to investigate variables that are likely to reduce the risk of unfavorable outcomes such as subsequent confinement or back-referral to inpatient treatment, we analyzed data from a forensic outpatient data project run by the federal state of Baden-Württemberg (Forensic outpatient documentation system). Based on data provided by six forensic treatment units throughout the federal state of Baden-Württemberg since 2015, we compared 61 forensic outpatients that had either regularly ended treatment (group one, n = 25), or were referred back to a forensic hospital or prison (group two, n = 36). Information on the patients' working, living, and financial situation as well as information on their social network and relationship status, was used. The predictive validity of these factors on treatment outcome was tested with a logistic regression model.
Results: There were a number of a priori differences between the groups, but pro-social leisure activities in an outpatient environment and migration status were the only significant predictors of positive vs. negative outcome.
Discussion: Implications of these findings are discussed.
Keywords: desistance; forensic outpatient treatment; forensic psychiatry; living conditions; violence; violent behaviour.
Copyright © 2020 Klinger, Ross and Bulla.
Similar articles
-
[Characteristics of forensic patients assigned to forensic outpatient treatment].Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2015 Jan;83(1):38-43. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1385743. Epub 2015 Jan 20. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2015. PMID: 25602190 German.
-
Rising inpatient numbers in forensic security hospitals of German federal state of Baden-Württemberg: Background and explanatory approaches.Behav Sci Law. 2020 Sep;38(5):522-536. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2481. Epub 2020 Aug 22. Behav Sci Law. 2020. PMID: 32827339
-
Survey on the Prescription Patterns of Pharmacological Agents in Individuals Who Have Committed Sexual Offenses During Forensic Outpatient Treatment in Germany: How Many Discontinue Testosterone Lowering Medication Under Parole?J Sex Med. 2022 Jul;19(7):1147-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 May 24. J Sex Med. 2022. PMID: 35624071
-
Are Women Really Different? Comparison of Men and Women in a Sample of Forensic Psychiatric Inpatients.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 23;13:857468. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.857468. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35401259 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Relationship between comorbidity and violence risk assessment in forensic psychiatry - the implication of neuroimaging studies.Psychiatr Danub. 2010 Jun;22(2):253-6. Psychiatr Danub. 2010. PMID: 20562756 Review.
Cited by
-
Patients' and volunteer coaches' experiences with an informal social network intervention in forensic psychiatric care: a qualitative analysis.BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04594-2. BMC Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37101177 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of an additive informal social network intervention for forensic psychiatric outpatients: results of a randomized controlled trial.Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 24;14:1129492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1129492. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37293397 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hahn G, Wörthmüller M. (2011). Forensische Nachsorgeambulanzen in Deutschland. Patientenstruktur, Interventionsformen und Verlauf in der Nachsorge psychisch kranker Straftäter nach Entlassung aus dem Maßregelvollzug gem, 63. In Schriften zur psychosozialen Gesundheit.
-
- Sauter J, Seewald K, Dahle K-P. Wirksamkeit ambulanter forensischer Nachsorge-Was wissen wir wirklich? Übersichtsarbeit uber den aktuellen Forschungsstand in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In Bewaehrungshilfe (2017) 64(2):146–62.
-
- Bonta J, Andrews DA. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. Sixth Edition New York: Routledge; (2016). 2017. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315677187 - DOI
-
- Eisenberg MJ, van Horn JE, Dekker JM, Assink M, van der Put CE, Hendriks J, et al. Static and dynamic predictors of general and violent criminal offense recidivism in the forensic outpatient population: a meta-analysis. In Criminal Justice Behav (2019) 46(5):732–50. 10.1177/0093854819826109 - DOI
-
- Mallik-Kane K, Visher CA. Health and Prisoner Reentry: How Physical, Mental, and Substance Abuse Conditions Shape the Process of Reintegration. DC: Washington; (2008). 10.1037/e719772011-001 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources