Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 12:8:61.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00061. eCollection 2020.

Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects: Current Clinical Therapeutic Strategies and Future Directions Using 3D Printing

Affiliations
Review

Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects: Current Clinical Therapeutic Strategies and Future Directions Using 3D Printing

Luciano Vidal et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

The healing of bone fractures is a well-orchestrated physiological process involving multiple cell types and signaling molecules interacting at the fracture site to replace and repair bone tissue without scar formation. However, when the lesion is too large, normal healing is compromised. These so-called non-union bone fractures, mostly arising due to trauma, tumor resection or disease, represent a major therapeutic challenge for orthopedic and reconstructive surgeons. In this review, we firstly present the current commonly employed surgical strategies comprising auto-, allo-, and xenograft transplantations, as well as synthetic biomaterials. Further to this, we discuss the multiple factors influencing the effectiveness of the reconstructive therapy. One essential parameter is adequate vascularization that ensures the vitality of the bone grafts thereby supporting the regeneration process, however deficient vascularization presents a frequently encountered problem in current management strategies. To address this challenge, vascularized bone grafts, including free or pedicled fibula flaps, or in situ approaches using the Masquelet induced membrane, or the patient's body as a bioreactor, comprise feasible alternatives. Finally, we highlight future directions and novel strategies such as 3D printing and bioprinting which could overcome some of the current challenges in the field of bone defect reconstruction, with the benefit of fabricating personalized and vascularized scaffolds.

Keywords: bone regeneration; large bone defects; three-dimensional printing; tissue engineering; vascularization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Current biological bone reconstruction techniques. Bone defects arising due to the resection of tumors or non-union fractures can be treated with the various methods indicated, with the benefits (+) and disadvantages (−) of each technique outlined.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Fibula free vascularized flap. The anatomy including the tibia, fibula and major vessels is indicated. The surgical steps comprising the fibula flap, the gold standard clinical technique for large bone defect reconstruction, is demonstrated. Step 1 illustrates the flap dissection to obtain the bone flap with its vascular pedicle. Step 2 represents the bone flap with its vascular pedicle ready to be transplanted to the bone defect.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Workflow involved in customizable bone construct fabrication. (1) CT scans of the patient’s bone are acquired. (2) Computer aided software enables the processing of CT images in order to (3) 3D print personalized scaffolds for (4) bone defect reconstruction. The lower panel illustrates a real large bone defect reconstruction in a sheep metatarsal bone model.

References

    1. Ahlmann E. R., Menendez L. R., Kermani C., Gotha H. (2006). Survivorship and clinical outcome of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction for neoplastic disease of the lower limb. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 88 790–795. 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6.17519 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albrektsson T., Johansson C. (2001). Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur. Spine J. 10(Suppl. 2), 96–101. 10.1007/s005860100282 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aro H. T., Aho A. J. (1993). Clinical use of bone allografts. Ann. Med. 25 403–412. 10.3109/07853899309147303 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aronson J., Harrison B. H., Stewart C. L., Harp J. H. (1989). The histology of distraction osteogenesis using different external fixators. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 241 106–116. - PubMed
    1. Athanasiou V. T., Papachristou D. J., Panagopoulos A., Saridis A., Scopa C. D., Megas P. (2010). Histological comparison of autograft, allograft-DBM, xenograft, and synthetic grafts in a trabecular bone defect: an experimental study in rabbits. Med. Sci. Monit. 16 BR24–BR31. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources