Evidence for a 'window of opportunity' in hidradenitis suppurativa treated with adalimumab: a retrospective, real-life multicentre cohort study
- PMID: 32119111
- DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18983
Evidence for a 'window of opportunity' in hidradenitis suppurativa treated with adalimumab: a retrospective, real-life multicentre cohort study
Abstract
Background: The anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α adalimumab is the only licenced biologic for moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). No predictors of response have been identified so far.
Objectives: To identify clinical parameters predicting response to adalimumab and confirm its efficacy/safety.
Methods: The data of 389 patients with HS treated with adalimumab in 21 Italian centres were reviewed. Sex, age at onset/diagnosis/baseline, body mass index, smoking, phenotype, previous treatments, concomitant antibiotics and 'therapeutic delay', defined as the time from HS onset to adalimumab initiation, were assessed. Response to adalimumab and its impact on quality of life (QoL) were evaluated using the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) or the Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS pain), respectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed.
Results: The therapeutic delay correlated to lack of response to adalimumab at week 16 [odds ratio (OR) 1·92 for therapeutic delay > 10 years; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·28-2·89; P = 0·0016). HiSCR was achieved in 43·7% and 53·9% patients at week 16 and 52, respectively. Significant reductions in both DLQI and VAS pain were found between week 16 vs. baseline (P < 0·0001 for both) and week 52 vs. baseline (P < 0·0001 for both). Previous immunosuppressants inversely correlated to HiSCR at week 52 (OR = 1·74, 95% CI 1·04-2·91, P = 0·0342).
Conclusions: Inverse correlation between therapeutic delay and clinical response was found, supporting early adalimumab use and providing evidence for a 'window of opportunity' in HS treatment. Adalimumab efficacy and safety were confirmed, along with patients' QoL improvement. Immunosuppressants could negatively influence the response to adalimumab inducing a switch to non-TNF-α-driven pathways.
© 2020 British Association of Dermatologists.
Comment in
-
First real-world data provide evidence for a 'window of opportunity' in treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa.Br J Dermatol. 2021 Jan;184(1):10-11. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19165. Epub 2020 May 31. Br J Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 32476130 No abstract available.
-
Synergistic multiple early therapy (SMET) for inflammatory diseases with pathogenic autoinflammatory feedback circuits.Br J Dermatol. 2021 Aug;185(2):469-470. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20077. Epub 2021 May 25. Br J Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 33797104 No abstract available.
References
-
- Jemec GB. Clinical practice. Hidradenitis suppurativa. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:158-64.
-
- Zouboulis CC, Desai N, Emtestam L et al. European S1 guideline for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 29:619-44.
-
- Hurley HJ. Axillary hyperhidrosis, apocrine bromhidrosis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and familial benign pemphigus: surgical approach. In: Dermatologic Surgery (Roenigk RK, Roenigk HH, eds). New York: Marcel Dekker, 1989; 729-39.
-
- Shlyankevich J, Chen AJ, Kim GE, Kimball AB. Hidradenitis suppurativa is a systemic disease with substantial comorbidity burden: a chart-verified case-control analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 71:1144-50.
-
- Saunte DM, Boer J, Stratigos A et al. Diagnostic delay in hidradenitis suppurativa is a global problem. Br J Dermatol 2015; 173:1546-9.