Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

User-Centered Guidance for Engineering and Design of Decentralized Sanitation Technologies

In: RTI Press Research Brief [Internet]. Research Triangle Park (NC): RTI Press; 2014.
2018 Jun.
Free Books & Documents
Review

User-Centered Guidance for Engineering and Design of Decentralized Sanitation Technologies

Laura Morrison et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Technological innovations in sanitation are poised to address the great need for sanitation improvements in low-income countries. Worldwide, more than 2.4 billion people lack access to improved sanitation facilities. Innovative waste treatment and sanitation technologies aim to incorporate user-centered findings into technology engineering and design. Without a focus on users, even the most innovative technology solutions can encounter significant barriers to adoption. Drawing on a household survey conducted in urban slum communities of Ahmedabad, India, this research brief identifies toilet and sanitation preferences, amenities, and attributes that might promote adoption of improved sanitation technologies among potential user populations. This work uses supplemental insights gained from focus groups and findings from the literature. Based on our research, we offer specific guidance for engineering and design of sanitation products and technologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. Progress on sanitation and drinking water: 2015 update and MDG assessment. 2015. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/publications/index_82419.html
    1. Katukiza AY, Ronteltap M, Niwagaba CB, Foppen JW, Kansiime F, Lens PN. Sustainable sanitation technology options for urban slums. Biotechnol Adv 2012;30(5):964–78. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.02.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joshi D, Fawcett B, Mannan F. Health, hygiene and appropriate sanitation: experiences and perceptions of the urban poor. Environ Urban 2011. Apr;23(1):91–111. 10.1177/0956247811398602 - DOI
    1. Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care—an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14(5):542–9. 10.1197/jamia.M2384 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seymour Z, Hughes J. Sanitation in developing countries: a systematic review of user preferences and motivations. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 2014. Dec;4(4):681–91. 10.2166/washdev.2014.127 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources