Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Book

Central Toxic Keratopathy

In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan.
.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Book

Central Toxic Keratopathy

Majid Moshirfar et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Excimer laser ablation is an increasingly popular option for the correction of mild to moderate refractive errors in the United States. It is generally regarded as safe, with an overall annual complication rate of less than 0.8% since 2010. Central toxic keratopathy (CTK), first described in 1998, has numerous alternative descriptive names including stage IV diffuse lamellar keratitis, central lamellar keratitis, central flap necrosis, central necrosis lamellar inflammation, and keratinocyte-induced corneal micro edema (KME). This rare clinical syndrome classically presents as a central or paracentral, amorphous corneal opacification with associated striae, stromal loss, and hyperopic shifts that usually present within nine days of excimer laser ablation (i.e., laser-assisted keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratopathy [PRK]). It is believed to be non-inflammatory, but its cause is still unknown. Though initially thought of as a progression, or severe form, of diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK), there is significant support that CTK is a distinct and separate entity from DLK. In addition to cases in other refractive surgeries, there are proposals that CTK exists as an entity outside of the refractive surgery literature: there have been reports of CTK associated with contact lens use with and without recent mechanical debridement, idiopathically, as well as potentially with selective laser trabeculoplasty or topical anesthetic use.[11]

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: Majid Moshirfar declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Jordan Hastings declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Yasmyne Ronquillo declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Bhupendra Patel declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

References

    1. Chua D, Htoon HM, Lim L, Chan CM, Mehta JS, Tan DTH, Rosman M. Eighteen-year prospective audit of LASIK outcomes for myopia in 53 731 eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;103(9):1228-1234. - PubMed
    1. Fraenkel GE, Cohen PR, Sutton GL, Lawless MA, Rogers CM. Central focal interface opacity after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 1998 Sep-Oct;14(5):571-6. - PubMed
    1. Linebarger EJ, Hardten DR, Lindstrom RL. Diffuse lamellar keratitis: diagnosis and management. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Jul;26(7):1072-7. - PubMed
    1. Lyle WA, Jin GJ. Central lamellar keratitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Apr;27(4):487-90. - PubMed
    1. Hainline BC, Price MO, Choi DM, Price FW. Central flap necrosis after LASIK with microkeratome and femtosecond laser created flaps. J Refract Surg. 2007 Mar;23(3):233-42. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources