Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0229611.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229611. eCollection 2020.

Correlation between histogram-based DCE-MRI parameters and 18F-FDG PET values in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Evaluation in primary tumors and metastatic nodes

Affiliations

Correlation between histogram-based DCE-MRI parameters and 18F-FDG PET values in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Evaluation in primary tumors and metastatic nodes

Antonello Vidiri et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the correlation between histogram-based Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters and positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG-PET) values in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), both in primary tumors (PTs) and in metastatic lymph nodes (LNs).

Methods: 52 patients with a new pathologically-confirmed OPSCC were included in the present retrospective cohort study. Imaging including DCE-MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were acquired in all patients. Both PTs and the largest LN, if present, were volumetrically contoured. Quantitative parameters, including the transfer constants, Ktrans and Kep, and the volume of extravascular extracellular space, ve, were calculated from DCE-MRI. The percentiles (P), P10, P25, P50, P75, P90, and skewness, kurtosis and entropy were obtained from the histogram-based analysis of each perfusion parameter. Standardized uptake values (SUV), SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated applying a SUV threshold of 40%. The correlations between all variables were investigated with the Spearman-rank correlation test. To exclude false positive results under multiple testing, the Benjamini-Hockberg procedure was applied.

Results: No significant correlations were found between any parameters in PTs, while significant associations emerged between Ktrans and 18F-FDG PET parameters in LNs.

Conclusions: Evident relationships emerged between DCE-MRI and 18F-FDG PET parameters in OPSCC LNs, while no association was found in PTs. The complex relationships between perfusion and metabolic biomarkers should be interpreted separately for primary tumors and lymph-nodes. A multiparametric approach to analyze PTs and LNs before treatment is advisable in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
53-year-old man affected by HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue with a large metastatic lymph-node in the left IIa level, as shown on axial T2-weighted image (a). Ktrans map (b) indicates heterogeneous Ktrans levels in the metastatic lymph-node with a low median value of 0.27 min-1. Correspondently, a high 18F-FDG uptake (SUVmax: 14.48; SUVpeak: 10.5; SUVmean: 8.76) was found, as illustrated in 18F-FDG PET/CT image (c). Histogram of Ktrans values within the entire lymph node is shown (d).
Fig 2
Fig 2
72-year-old man affected by HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue with enlarged metastatic lymph-nodes in the left IIa/IIb level is shown on axial T2-weighted image (a). Ktrans map (b) indicates high Ktrans levels in the lymph-nodes, of which the largest posterior node was analyzed, with a median Ktrans of 2.08 min-1. Correspondently, a low to intermediate 18F-FDG uptake (SUVmax: 6.09; SUVpeak: 5.82; SUVmean: 4.2), was found, as illustrated in 18F-FDG PET/CT image (c). Histogram of Ktrans values within the entire lymph node is shown (d).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F et al. (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127:2893–2917. 10.1002/ijc.25516 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khalid MB, Ting P, Pai A et al. (2019) Initial presentation of human papillomavirus-related head and neck cancer: A retrospective review. Laryngoscope 129:877–882. 10.1002/lary.27296 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abraham J (2015) Imaging for head and neck cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 24 (3): 455–471. 10.1016/j.soc.2015.03.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cacicedo J, Navarro A, Del Hoyo O et al. (2016) Role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck oncology: The point of view of the radiation oncologist. Br J Radiol 89:20160217 10.1259/bjr.20160217 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chotchutipan T, Rosen BS, Hawkins PG et al. (2019) Volumetric (18) F-FDG-PET parameters as predictors of locoregional failure in low-risk HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer after definitive chemoradiation therapy. Head Neck 41:366–373. 10.1002/hed.25505 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms