Improved Accuracy in Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Visual Explanations
- PMID: 32119927
- DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.036
Improved Accuracy in Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Visual Explanations
Abstract
Background & aims: Narrow-band imaging (NBI) can be used to determine whether colorectal polyps are adenomatous or hyperplastic. We investigated whether an artificial intelligence (AI) system can increase the accuracy of characterizations of polyps by endoscopists of different skill levels.
Methods: We developed convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for evaluation of diminutive colorectal polyps, based on efficient neural architecture searches via parameter sharing with augmentation using NBIs of diminutive (≤5 mm) polyps, collected from October 2015 through October 2017 at the Seoul National University Hospital, Healthcare System Gangnam Center (training set). We trained the CNN using images from 1100 adenomatous polyps and 1050 hyperplastic polyps from 1379 patients. We then tested the system using 300 images of 180 adenomatous polyps and 120 hyperplastic polyps, obtained from January 2018 to May 2019. We compared the accuracy of 22 endoscopists of different skill levels (7 novices, 4 experts, and 11 NBI-trained experts) vs the CNN in evaluation of images (adenomatous vs hyperplastic) from 180 adenomatous and 120 hyperplastic polyps. The endoscopists then evaluated the polyp images with knowledge of the CNN-processed results. We conducted mixed-effect logistic and linear regression analyses to determine the effects of AI assistance on the accuracy of analysis of diminutive colorectal polyps by endoscopists (primary outcome).
Results: The CNN distinguished adenomatous vs hyperplastic diminutive polyps with 86.7% accuracy, based on histologic analysis as the reference standard. Endoscopists distinguished adenomatous vs hyperplastic diminutive polyps with 82.5% overall accuracy (novices, 73.8% accuracy; experts, 83.8% accuracy; and NBI-trained experts, 87.6% accuracy). With knowledge of the CNN-processed results, the overall accuracy of the endoscopists increased to 88.5% (P < .05). With knowledge of the CNN-processed results, the accuracy of novice endoscopists increased to 85.6% (P < .05). The CNN-processed results significantly reduced endoscopist time of diagnosis (from 3.92 to 3.37 seconds per polyp, P = .042).
Conclusions: We developed a CNN that significantly increases the accuracy of evaluation of diminutive colorectal polyps (as adenomatous vs hyperplastic) and reduces the time of diagnosis by endoscopists. This AI assistance system significantly increased the accuracy of analysis by novice endoscopists, who achieved near-expert levels of accuracy without extra training. The CNN assistance system can reduce the skill-level dependence of endoscopists and costs.
Keywords: Cancer Screening; Colorectal Cancer; Deep Learning; Diagnostic.
Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Hype or Reality? Will Artificial Intelligence Actually Make Us Better at Performing Optical Biopsy of Colon Polyps?Gastroenterology. 2020 Jun;158(8):2049-2051. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.038. Epub 2020 Mar 25. Gastroenterology. 2020. PMID: 32222397 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Accurate Classification of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Using Computer-Aided Analysis.Gastroenterology. 2018 Feb;154(3):568-575. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 16. Gastroenterology. 2018. PMID: 29042219
-
Deep Learning Localizes and Identifies Polyps in Real Time With 96% Accuracy in Screening Colonoscopy.Gastroenterology. 2018 Oct;155(4):1069-1078.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Jun 18. Gastroenterology. 2018. PMID: 29928897 Free PMC article.
-
Real-Time Characterization of Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Histology Using Narrow-Band Imaging: Implications for the Resect and Discard Strategy.Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):406-18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.042. Epub 2015 Oct 30. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 26522260 Free PMC article.
-
Virtual chromoendoscopy for the real-time assessment of colorectal polyps in vivo: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2017 Dec;21(79):1-308. doi: 10.3310/hta21790. Health Technol Assess. 2017. PMID: 29271339 Free PMC article.
-
Methods to become a high performer in characterization of colorectal polyp histology.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug;29(4):651-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 16. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26381309 Review.
Cited by
-
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Optical Biopsies of Colon Polyps: Hype or Reality?Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2022 Jan-Apr;10(1):77-78. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_524_21. Epub 2022 Jan 13. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 35283710 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A Novel Model Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network Improves Diagnostic Accuracy of Intramucosal Gastric Cancer (With Video).Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 20;11:622827. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.622827. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33959495 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence-assisted polyp diagnosis and AI-assisted digestive endoscopy: trends and growth in AI gastroenterology (2003-2023).Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 18;11:1438979. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1438979. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39359927 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence and automation in endoscopy and surgery.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Mar;20(3):171-182. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00701-y. Epub 2022 Nov 9. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023. PMID: 36352158 Review.
-
Survey on the perceptions of UK gastroenterologists and endoscopists to artificial intelligence.Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 17;13(5):423-429. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101994. eCollection 2022. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 36046492 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical