Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 27;10(3):385.
doi: 10.3390/ani10030385.

Consumers' Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare

Affiliations
Review

Consumers' Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare

Marta E Alonso et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the evolution of consumers' perceptions and concerns about the effects that intensification of production systems could have on the welfare of farm animals. Despite the differences in definitions of animal welfare that make perceptions about this complex subject extremely variable, there is a growing perception that farm animal welfare should be protected and improved. There is an increasing appreciation of animal welfare parameters over other quality attributes, and animal-friendly products are considered healthier, safer, tastier, more hygienic, authentic, environmentally friendly, and traditional by many consumers. The willingness to pay for the increases in price that higher levels of farm animal welfare could produce could be promoted by means of adequate information about management and housing conditions of the different farming species. Welfare-friendly products that are properly labeled with clear information provided by an internationally accepted, transparent, and traceable monitoring system will increase consumers' confidence in the food chain participants. Both consumers and citizens have the opportunity to improve the welfare of millions of farmed animals now and in the future, consumers by assuming their responsibility at the buying point, purchasing welfare-friendly products, and citizens by driving legislation to achieve some minimum standard of welfare conditions that could meet animals' needs.

Keywords: animal welfare; concerns; consumer; farming; perceptions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. FAO Animal Production. FAO’s Role in Animal Production. [(accessed on 27 December 2019)]; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2019. Available online: http://www.fao.org/animal-production/en/
    1. Fernandes J., Blache D., Maloney S.K., Martin G.B., Venus B., Walker F.R., Head B., Tilbrook A. Addressing animal welfare through collaborative stakeholder networks. Agriculture. 2019;9:132. doi: 10.3390/agriculture9060132. - DOI
    1. Godfray H.C.J., Garnett T. Food security and sustainable intensification. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2014;369:20120273. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0273. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buller H., Blokhuis H., Jensen P., Keeling L. Towards farm animal welfare and sustainability. Animals. 2018;8:81. doi: 10.3390/ani8060081. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miele M. Public attitudes and understanding of animal welfare standards: Could one welfare help? Animal welfare for a better world; Proceedings of the 4th OIE Global Conference on Animal Welfare; Guadalajara, Mexico. 6–8 December 2016; [(accessed on 12 December 2019)]. Available online: https://www.oie.int/eng/animal-welfare-conf2016/PTT/2.2.%20Miele.pdf.

LinkOut - more resources