Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 28;21(5):1658.
doi: 10.3390/ijms21051658.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Esophageal Cancers: are we Finally Finding the Right Path in the Mist?

Affiliations
Review

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Esophageal Cancers: are we Finally Finding the Right Path in the Mist?

Caterina Vivaldi et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Esophageal cancer remains a challenging disease due to limited treatment options and poor prognosis. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of highly lethal malignancies, such as non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma. Recent clinical trials also showed promising activity in immune checkpoint inhibitors in pretreated advanced esophageal carcinoma and a potentially significant impact on the outcome of selected patients, independently of histology. Combination studies evaluating immunotherapy and chemotherapy and, in localized disease, radiotherapy are in progress and will hopefully confirm their promises in the near future. However, reliable predictive biomarkers are still lacking. Indeed, at present, the role of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression and other factors (such as microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden) as predictive biomarkers of benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitors is still controversial. Our aim was to explore the rationale of ICIs in esophageal cancer, review the results already available in multiple settings, and investigate future perspectives with single-agent and combination strategies.

Keywords: checkpoint inhibitors; esophageal cancer; immunotherapy; predictive factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.V. received speaking honoraria from Eli Lilly and travel grants from Bayer. L.F. received speaking honoraria from Eli Lilly and travel grants from Celgene. A.F. received honoraria from Bayer, Bristol, Eli Lilly, Merck, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Servier, and institutional support for clinical trials from Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol, Eli Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Servier. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li M., Wan X., Wang Y., Sun Y., Yang G., Wang L. Time trends of esophageal and gastric cancer mortality in China, 1991–2009: An age-period-cohort analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:6797. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07071-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019;69:7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson L.A., Tavilla A., Brenner H., Luttmann S., Navarro C., Gavin A.T., Holleczek B., Johnston B.T., Cook M.B., Bannon F., et al. Survival for oesophageal, stomach and small intestine cancers in Europe 1999–2007: Results from eurocare-5. Eur. J. Cancer. 2015;51:2144–2157. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.026. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lordick F., Mariette C., Haustermans K., Obermannová R., Arnold D., Committee G. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up † on behalf of the ESMO. Ann. Oncol. 2016;27:V50–V57. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw329. - DOI - PubMed