Do we need to go further to train healthcare providers in the targeted regions for malaria elimination in Myanmar? A mixed-methods study
- PMID: 32123518
- PMCID: PMC7035698
- DOI: 10.1186/s41182-020-00196-w
Do we need to go further to train healthcare providers in the targeted regions for malaria elimination in Myanmar? A mixed-methods study
Abstract
Background: The National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) in Myanmar trained health staff at the township level starting in mid-2016 in order to achieve the Plasmodium falciparum malaria elimination target by 2020. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and perception of Basic Health Staff (BHS) and Vector-borne Diseases Control (VBDC) teams exposed to a short training course on malaria elimination in six targeted townships which included two conflict-affected townships between 2016 and 2017.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional mixed-methods study using quantitative and qualitative data extracted from one survey database conducted between October 2018 and March 2019. Modified Poisson regression analysis was performed to ascertain the determinants of low knowledge scores after the training programme.
Results: Altogether, 544 trained frontline health workers involved in malaria elimination at the time of the survey were recruited and 56% (302/544) were stationed at sub-Rural Health Centers. More than half of the respondents had correct knowledge of malaria case categories although relapse and recrudescent cases (39% and 37% respectively) were less well known. Over two-thirds of respondents could mention those eligible for malaria testing. Less than 30% knew the foci classification. The overall knowledge scores ranged from 10 to 31. The significant predictors of low level of knowledge [the cut-off point was set at the median value of 21 (IQR 12-30)] in multivariate analysis were the younger age group (18-29 years) and health staff who had attended malaria elimination training in 2017, [(APR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2)]; and (APR = 1.5, 95%CI 1.2-1.8)]. Qualitative data from 10 key informants identified perceived challenges in conflict-affected areas as well as in areas of high population mobility with further implications for case surveillance. In addition, the low level of education of community members was noted as one of the barriers that hampered public readiness in the elimination scenario.
Conclusion: A significant impact on knowledge improvement after the training programme was not visible especially for correct notification of malaria cases and treatment according to National Malaria Elimination Guidelines. Regular monitoring and continuing guidance by the higher level management is critical to support the field staff.
Keywords: Health staff; Knowledge; Malaria elimination; Myanmar; Perceptions; SORT IT; Training.
© The Author(s) 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Challenges in early phase of implementing the 1-3-7 surveillance and response approach in malaria elimination setting: A field study from Myanmar.Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Feb 10;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-0632-7. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020. PMID: 32036792 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding malaria treatment-seeking preferences within the public sector amongst mobile/migrant workers in a malaria elimination scenario: a mixed-methods study.Malar J. 2017 Nov 13;16(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-2113-4. Malar J. 2017. PMID: 29132373 Free PMC article.
-
Access to primaquine in the last mile: challenges at the service delivery points in pre-elimination era, Myanmar.Trop Med Health. 2018 Sep 18;46:32. doi: 10.1186/s41182-018-0115-8. eCollection 2018. Trop Med Health. 2018. PMID: 30250397 Free PMC article.
-
Reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination in Myanmar: a literature review.Malar J. 2023 Apr 27;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04567-6. Malar J. 2023. PMID: 37106350 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A qualitative review of implementer perceptions of the national community-level malaria surveillance system in Southern Province, Zambia.Malar J. 2016 Aug 8;15(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1455-7. Malar J. 2016. PMID: 27502213 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of joint 3 + 1 malaria strategy along China-Myanmar cross border areas.BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 14;21(1):1246. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06920-z. BMC Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 34906092 Free PMC article.
-
From control to elimination: a spatial-temporal analysis of malaria along the China-Myanmar border.Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Nov 19;9(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00777-1. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020. PMID: 33213516 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization . Global Malaria Programme. A framework for malaria elimination. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
-
- World Health Organization . World Malaria Report 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
-
- World Health Organization . Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016-2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
-
- National Malaria Control Programme . Malaria surveillance in elimination settings : an operational manual 2018 Version 1.0. Nay Pyi Taw: National Malaria Control Programme; 2018.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous