Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: The Current Evidence
- PMID: 32123654
- PMCID: PMC7041666
- DOI: 10.14444/6072
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: The Current Evidence
Abstract
Background: Fusion of the sacroiliac (SI) joint as a treatment for low back pain remains controversial. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the current literature and clinical outcomes of SI joint fusion surgery.
Methods: We conducted a literature review and included studies with the term "sacroiliac joint fusion" that had at least 12 months of clinical follow-up, reported on minimally invasive techniques, and included patient-reported outcome measures.
Results: Two approach types (dorsal and lateral) and numerous different implant manufacturers were identified. Most studies included level 4 data, with a small number of level 2 prospective cohort studies and 2 prospective level 1 studies. Every reviewed study reported clinical benefit in terms of improved pain scores or improvement in validated disability measures. Complication rates were low.
Conclusions: Minimally invasive SI joint fusion provides clinically significant improvement in pain scores and disability in most patients, across multiple studies and implant manufacturers.
Level of evidence: 5.
Clinical relevance: Emerging evidence in support of SI joint fusion indicates that clinicians should examine the SI joint and include SI joint pain in their differential diagnosis for low back pain patients.
Keywords: SI fusion; back pain; biomechanics; evidence; outcomes; review; sacroiliac joint fusion.
©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures and COI: Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted work. This paper is exempt from institutional review board review because it is not human subjects research. There was no external source of funding for this study.
Figures



References
-
- Manchikanti L, Singh V, Datta S, Cohen SP, Hirsch JA. American Society of Interventional Pain P. Comprehensive review of epidemiology, scope, and impact of spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2009;12(4):E35–E70. - PubMed
-
- Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008;299(6):656–664. - PubMed
-
- Martin BI, Turner JA, Mirza SK, Lee MJ, Comstock BA, Deyo RA. Trends in health care expenditures, utilization, and health status among US adults with spine problems, 1997-2006. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(19):2077–2084. - PubMed
-
- Sembrano JN, Polly DW., Jr How often is low back pain not coming from the back? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(1):E27–E32. - PubMed
-
- Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20(1):31–37. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials