Assessment of textbook oncologic outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma
- PMID: 32124437
- DOI: 10.1002/jso.25861
Assessment of textbook oncologic outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Abstract
Background: Composite outcomes may more accurately reflect patient and provider expectations around optimal care. We sought to determine the impact of achieving a so-called "textbook oncologic outcome" (TOO) among patients undergoing resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Methods: Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC between 2006 and 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). TOO was defined by: margin negative resection, compliant lymph node evaluation, no prolonged length-of-stay, no 30-day readmission/mortality, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. Factors associated with TOO and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using multivariable logistic and Cox regression models, respectively.
Results: Among 18 608 patients who underwent PD at 782 hospitals, many patients successfully achieved certain TOO factors such as R0 margin (77.9%) and no 30-day mortality (96.9%), while other TOO criteria such as receipt of adjuvant therapy (48.2%) were achieved less frequently. Overall, only 3124 (16.8%) patients achieved a TOO. Factors associated with lower odds of TOO included: older age, Black race, Medicaid insurance, Community facility, and low PD facility (<20 PD/y) (all P < .05). Achievement of a TOO was associated with lower risk of mortality (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70-0.77).
Conclusions: While TOO was associated with improved long-term survival, TOO was only achieved in 16.8% of patients undergoing PD.
Keywords: adenocarcinoma; outcomes; pancreaticoduodenectomy; textbook; whipple.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Textbook oncologic outcome: A promising summary metric of high-quality care, but are we on the same page?J Surg Oncol. 2020 May;121(6):923-924. doi: 10.1002/jso.25872. Epub 2020 Mar 2. J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32124430 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Lillemoe KD, Talamonti MS, Ko CY. Assessment of pancreatic cancer care in the United States based on formally developed quality indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(12):848-859.
-
- Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ, Finks JF, et al. Composite measures for profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery performance. JAMA Surgery. 2014;149(1):10-16.
-
- Dimick JB, Staiger DO, Baser O, Birkmeyer JD. Composite measures for predicting surgical mortality in the hospital. Health Aff. 2009;28(4):1189-1198.
-
- Dimick JB, Staiger DO, Birkmeyer JD. Ranking hospitals on surgical mortality: the importance of reliability adjustment. Health Serv Res. 2010;45(6 Pt 1):1614-1629.
-
- Dimick JB, Staiger DO, Osborne NH, Nicholas LH, Birkmeyer JD. Composite measures for rating hospital quality with major surgery. Health Serv Res. 2012;47(5):1861-1879.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
