Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200319.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0319.

Current and Future Spatiotemporal Patterns of Lyme Disease Reporting in the Northeastern United States

Affiliations

Current and Future Spatiotemporal Patterns of Lyme Disease Reporting in the Northeastern United States

Donal Bisanzio et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: The incidence and geographic range of Lyme disease continues to increase in the United States because of the expansion of Ixodes scapularis, the species of tick that is the main Lyme disease vector. Currently, no dynamic model for the disease spread exists that integrates information of both acarological and human case surveillance data.

Objective: To characterize the spatiotemporal spread of Lyme disease in humans among counties in US endemic regions.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study modeled the spread of Lyme disease county-level case reporting, accounting for county-level demographic factors, environmental factors associated with tick presence and human exposure, and the spatiotemporal association between counties. The analyses were conducted between January and August 2019. The setting was 1405 counties in the following regions of the United States: West North Central, East North Central, New England, Middle Atlantic, and the South. Assessments were based on publicly available Lyme disease case data reported to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) between January 2000 and December 2017.

Main outcomes and measures: Probability of reporting the first case of Lyme disease by county by year.

Results: Between 2000 and 2017, a total of 497 569 Lyme disease cases were reported to the CDC in the study area. Reporting a first case of Lyme disease was associated with a county's and county's neighbors' forest coverage, elevation, percentage of population living in the wildland-urban interface, tick presence, county's population size, proportion of neighbors reporting cases, and neighbors' years since first reporting. The model that included these variables showed high predictive power, with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 81.1 (95% CI, 68.5-86.2). The model predicted the first reported Lyme disease case a mean (SD) of 5.5 (3.5) years earlier than was reported to the CDC, with a mean spread velocity estimated at 27.4 (95% CI, 13.6-54.4) km per year. Among 162 counties without reported cases, 47 (29.0%) had a high probability of reporting Lyme disease by 2018. The estimated mean time lag between the first reported case in a neighboring county and any county was 7 (95% CI, 3-8) years.

Conclusions and relevance: This study's findings suggest that, if updated regularly and expanded geographically, this predictive model could enable states and counties to develop more specific Lyme disease prevention and control plans, including improved sensitization of the general population and medical community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Reported Lyme Disease Cases and Estimated Probability of Case Reporting by 2018
The spread of reported Lyme disease cases predicted by the diffusion model showed high similarity to the observed data reported to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. First Year of Lyme Disease Case Reporting and Modeled Spread of Lyme Disease
Timing of first Lyme disease reporting estimated with the model showed a spread pattern similar to that of data reported to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Estimated Probabilities of Counties to Report a Lyme Disease Case by 2018 if They Had Reported Lyme Disease Cases for the First Time in 2016 and 2017
The error bars represent ±1.5 times the interquartile range.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Mean Time Lag of Any County to Report a First Case of Lyme Disease Based on the Reporting Status of Neighboring Counties
The number on the y-axis represents the mean year lag since the first case was reported in neighboring counties, and the number on the x-axis represents the number of reporting neighboring counties. NB indicates first-degree neighboring county.

Comment in

  • Challenges in Predicting Lyme Disease Risk.
    Kugeler KJ, Eisen RJ. Kugeler KJ, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200328. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0328. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32125424 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Barbour AG, Fish D. The biological and social phenomenon of Lyme disease. Science. 1993;260(5114):-. doi:10.1126/science.8503006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steere AC, Coburn J, Glickstein L. The emergence of Lyme disease. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(8):1093-1101. doi:10.1172/JCI21681 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Killilea ME, Swei A, Lane RS, Briggs CJ, Ostfeld RS. Spatial dynamics of Lyme disease: a review. Ecohealth. 2008;5(2):167-195. doi:10.1007/s10393-008-0171-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nelson CA, Saha S, Kugeler KJ, et al. . Incidence of clinician-diagnosed Lyme disease, United States, 2005-2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(9):1625-1631. doi:10.3201/eid2109.150417 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenberg R, Lindsey NP, Fischer M, et al. . Vital signs: trends in reported vectorborne disease cases: United States and territories, 2004-2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(17):496-501. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6717e1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types