Surgical treatment of children and youth with congenital melanocytic nevi: self- and proxy-reported opinions
- PMID: 32125501
- DOI: 10.1007/s00383-020-04633-z
Surgical treatment of children and youth with congenital melanocytic nevi: self- and proxy-reported opinions
Abstract
Purpose: The role of surgery in the management of congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) is controversial. Data on surgical outcomes and predictors of satisfaction remain scarce.
Methods: An online survey was employed following worldwide recruitment of youth aged 14-25 years (n = 44) and parents of children ≤ 18 years (n = 249) with CMN to query patterns of treatment and satisfaction with and opinions about the benefits of surgery.
Results: In proxy-reports, 121 of 249 (49%) and in self-reports 30 of 44 (75%) participants underwent CMN excision. The most common reasons for surgery were psychosocial determinants, aesthetic improvement, and melanoma risk reduction. The overall satisfaction with surgical management was good, although no predictors for satisfaction could be identified. Higher current age of the child was found to predict decision regret in proxy-reports. Most participants indicated that having a scar is more socially acceptable than a CMN. Opinions differed on whether surgery should be deferred until the child is old enough to be involved in the decision-making process.
Conclusions: Whether and when to perform surgery in children with CMN is a multifaceted question. Awareness of common concerns as well as risks and benefits of surgery are essential to ensure critical reflection and balanced decision-making.
Keywords: Children; Melanocytic nevi; Outcome; Patient satisfaction; Surgery.
Similar articles
-
Management of challenging congenital melanocytic nevi: outcomes study of serial excision.J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Apr;50(4):613-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.08.020. Epub 2014 Dec 12. J Pediatr Surg. 2015. PMID: 25840073
-
Management of congenital melanocytic nevi in the plastic surgery clinic: Families' expectations and their persistent concern about malignancy.Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Nov;36(6):876-881. doi: 10.1111/pde.13987. Epub 2019 Aug 29. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019. PMID: 31468600
-
The controversial management of giant congenital melanocytic nevi. When would it be better "to wait and see"?G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Apr;148(2):203-7. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2013. PMID: 23588146
-
The outcome of using different surgical modalities and laser therapy in the treatment of small- and medium-sized congenital melanocytic nevi: a systematic review.Int J Dermatol. 2020 May;59(5):535-542. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14727. Epub 2019 Dec 3. Int J Dermatol. 2020. PMID: 31792950
-
Current management approaches for congenital melanocytic nevi.Dermatol Clin. 2012 Jul;30(3):377-87. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Jun 6. Dermatol Clin. 2012. PMID: 22800546 Review.
Cited by
-
Psychosocial health and psychological adjustment in adolescents and young adults with congenital melanocytic nevi: Analysis of self-reports.Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 25;13:911830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911830. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36160549 Free PMC article.
-
Reviewing next of kin regrets in surgical decision-making: cross-sectional analysis of systematically searched literature.J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Jan 25;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00539-1. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023. PMID: 36695927 Free PMC article.
-
Measurement instruments for the core outcome set of congenital melanocytic naevi and an assessment of the measurement properties according to COSMIN: a systematic review.JPRAS Open. 2022 Nov 23;35:58-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2022.11.003. eCollection 2023 Mar. JPRAS Open. 2022. PMID: 36691582 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical