Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;104(3):245-255.
doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00650-2. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

Assessment of the young adult hip joint using plain radiographs

Affiliations
Review

Assessment of the young adult hip joint using plain radiographs

R Popat et al. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Radiographic examination remains the mainstay of the initial assessment of the young adult hip; however, common parameters are required to assist in the formation of accurate diagnoses and appropriate management plans. This paper aims to summarise the most important aspects of the assessment of plain radiographs performed on the young adult hip joint.

Keywords: Assessment; Hip joint; Radiographs; Young adult.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
AP radiograph pelvis depicting pelvic rotation and tilt. The central sacral line (green dotted line) should be aligned centrally from the tip of the coccyx to the symphysis pubis. The obturator foramina (blue arrows), ischial spine and trochanters should be symmetrical. In this case, there is a slight pelvic rotation. The distance between sacro-coccygeal junction and the superior end of the symphysis (red arrow) is used to determine the pelvic tilt. A benign sclerotic ring is seen in the left trochanteric region
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cross-table lateral view
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
False profile lateral view
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Frog lateral view
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Dunn lateral view
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
a Teardrop sign. The U-shaped (blue line) teardrop consists of ilioischial line (red dotted arrow) and floor of the acetabulum. b Teardrop distance
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Sourcil (Tönnis) angle. The right hip (green angle) represents normal Sourcil angle, whereas the left hip (red angle) represents increased Sourcil angle. Lateral translation of the femoral head is clearly visible in keeping with hip dysplasia
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Anterior and posterior acetabular walls do not crossover and are only in contact at the lateral edge of the Sourcil suggestive of an anteverted acetabulum
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
a AP radiograph pelvis. There is a crossover of the anterior and posterior walls of the left acetabulum, which represents acetabular retroversion. b CT axial image of the same patient which demonstrates left acetabular retroversion
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Red line represents a physeal scar which is seen to extend along the lateral margin of the femoral head–neck creating a CAM-type deformity
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
a Fovea on the right (red depression) is in contact with the Sourcil and represents Fovea alta. b Fovea on the left (green depression) is located medially and inferiorly and is therefore normally situated
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Neck-shaft angle. a Right hip (red angle) measures 119° and therefore is regarded as coxa vara. b Left hip (green angle) measures 149° and therefore represents coxa valga
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
MR axial proton density (PD) sequences. a Level of the left femoral neck demonstrating femoral neck-horizontal angle. b Trans-condylar axis of the left knee demonstrating trans-condylar horizontal angle
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
Alpha angle on lateral plain radiograph of left hip
Fig. 15
Fig. 15
Right hip (blue dotted line) demonstrates preserved Shenton’s line. The left hip (red dotted line) represents ‘breaking’ of Shenton’s line resulting from superior and lateral subluxation of the dysplastic hip joint

References

    1. Parker S, Nagra NS, Kulkarni K, Pegrum J, Barry S, Hughes R, et al. Inadequate pelvic radiographs: Implications of not getting it right the first time. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0095. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis - What the radiologist should know. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1540–1552. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0921. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaulé PE, Kim YJ, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, et al. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A. 2008;90:47–66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00756. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kay RM, Jaki KA, Skaggs DL. The effect of femoral rotation on the projected femoral neck-shaft angle. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20:736–739. doi: 10.1097/00004694-200011000-00007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ching W, Robinson J, Mcentee M. Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systematic review. J Med Radiat Sci. 2014;61:176–190. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.66. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources