Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul-Aug:36:101611.
doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101611. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

Delivering multi-disease screening to migrants for latent TB and blood-borne viruses in an emergency department setting: A feasibility study

Affiliations

Delivering multi-disease screening to migrants for latent TB and blood-borne viruses in an emergency department setting: A feasibility study

Sally Hargreaves et al. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in migrants is important for elimination of tuberculosis in low-incidence countries, alongside the need to detect blood-borne infections to align with new guidelines on migrant screening for multiple infections in European countries. However, feasibility needs to be better understood.

Methods: We did a feasibility study to test an innovative screening model offering combined testing for LTBI (QuantiFERON), HIV, hepatitis B/C in a UK emergency department, with two year follow-up.

Results: 96 economic migrants, asylum seekers and refugees from 43 countries were screened (46 [47.9%] women; mean age 35.2 years [SD 11.7; range 18-73]; mean time in the UK 4.8 years [SD 3.2; range 0-10]). 14 migrants (14.6%) tested positive for LTBI alongside HIV [1], hepatitis B [2], and hepatitis C [1] Of migrants with LTBI, 5 (35.7%) were successfully engaged in treatment. 74 (77.1%) migrants reported no previous screening since migrating to the UK.

Conclusion: Multi-disease screening in this setting is feasible and merits being further tested in larger-scale studies. However, greater emphasis must be placed on ensuring successful treatment outcomes. We identified major gaps in current screening provision; most migrants had been offered no prior screening despite several years since migration, which holds relevance to policy and practice in the UK and other European countries.

Keywords: Europe; HIV; Health-service delivery; Hepatitis; LTBI; Latent TB; Migrant; Multi-disease screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screening pathways for recruited migrant patients (n = 96).

References

    1. Getahun H., Matteelli A., Abubakar I., Abdel Aziz M., Baddeley A., Barreira D. Management of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: WHO guidelines for low tuberculosis burden countries. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(6):1563–1576. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loutet M.G., Burman M., Jayasekera N., Trathen D., Dart S., Kunst H. National roll-out of latent tuberculosis testing and treatment for new migrants in England: a retrospective evaluation in a high-incidence area. Eur Respir J. 2018;51(1):1701226. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ECDC . ECDC; Stockholm: 2017. Tuberculosis surveillance and monitoring in Europe 2017.
    1. Hahné S.J., Veldhuijzen I.K., Wiessing L., Lim T.-A., Salminen M., van de Laar M. Infection with hepatitis B and C virus in Europe: a systematic review of prevalence and cost-effectiveness of screening. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13(1):181. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Veldhuijzen I.K., Toy M., Hahné S.J., De Wit G.A., Schalm S.W., Robert A. Screening and early treatment of migrants for chronic hepatitis B virus infection is cost-effective. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(2):522–530. - PubMed

Publication types