Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Dec;19(4):3136-3145.
doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i4.36.

Effect of target controlled propofol infusion versus intermittent boluses during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of target controlled propofol infusion versus intermittent boluses during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

Catherine Ndosi et al. Afr Health Sci. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Propofol is administered as intermittent boluses to achieve deep sedation to facilitate oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Target controlled infusion (TCI) can be employed for this purpose.

Methods: 176 adults were randomly allocated into two groups of 88 patients. Control group: Received an initial bolus of propofol 1mg/kg, with repeat boluses of 0.25mg/kg. Intervention group: Received an initial target effect-site concentration of 4mcg/ml, followed by maintenance target effect-site concentration of 2.5mcg/ml, titrated by 0.5mcg/ml from baseline infusion rate as needed. Oxygen saturation, blood pressure and heart rate were evaluated immediately before administering the sedative and at 2.50, 5.00, 7.50 and 10.00 minutes. Oxygen desaturation below 90% in both study groups was recorded. Sedation starting time, stopping time, waking up time and overall duration of time to recovery of participants in each study arm was recorded.

Results: More hypoxic episodes were observed in the intermittent bolus group with statistically significant association between control and the incidence of hypoxia: Chi square test, p=0.037. There were more hypotensive episodes in the TCI group but not achieving statistical significance: Chi square test for association X2(1) = 0.962, p=0.327.The time to recovery between the two groups was comparable, with 18.84 ± 10.76 minutes in the bolus group and 19.72 ± 9.27 minutes in the TCI group; no statistically significant difference was shown: Student's t-test, p=0.0564.

Conclusion: TCI of propofol was associated with fewer episodes of hypoxia compared to intermittent bolus administration. Similar hemodynamic profiles and comparable time to recovery were demonstrated by these two sedation techniques.

Keywords: Target controlled propofol infusion; intermittent boluses; oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT Flow Diagram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Riphaus A, Geist C, Schrader K, Matchenko K, Wehrmann T. Intermittent manually controlled versus continuous infusion propofol for deep sedation during interventional endoscopy: A prospective randomized trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:1078–1085. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.685758. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists, author. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1004–1017. - PubMed
    1. Absalom AR1, Glen JI, Zwart GJ, Schnider TW, Struys MM. Target-Controlled Infusion: A Mature Technology. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:70–78. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marsaban AHM, Sumaratih L, Pryambodho Comparison between intermittent propofol bolus techniques and target controlled infusion in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy. 2013;14:132–138.
    1. Bannert C1, Reinhart K, Dunkler D, Trauner M, Renner F, Knoflach P, Ferlitsch A, Weiss W, Ferlitsch M. Sedation in screening colonoscopy: impact on quality indicators and complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1837–1848. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.347. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources