Effect of target controlled propofol infusion versus intermittent boluses during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 32127890
- PMCID: PMC7040342
- DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v19i4.36
Effect of target controlled propofol infusion versus intermittent boluses during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Propofol is administered as intermittent boluses to achieve deep sedation to facilitate oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Target controlled infusion (TCI) can be employed for this purpose.
Methods: 176 adults were randomly allocated into two groups of 88 patients. Control group: Received an initial bolus of propofol 1mg/kg, with repeat boluses of 0.25mg/kg. Intervention group: Received an initial target effect-site concentration of 4mcg/ml, followed by maintenance target effect-site concentration of 2.5mcg/ml, titrated by 0.5mcg/ml from baseline infusion rate as needed. Oxygen saturation, blood pressure and heart rate were evaluated immediately before administering the sedative and at 2.50, 5.00, 7.50 and 10.00 minutes. Oxygen desaturation below 90% in both study groups was recorded. Sedation starting time, stopping time, waking up time and overall duration of time to recovery of participants in each study arm was recorded.
Results: More hypoxic episodes were observed in the intermittent bolus group with statistically significant association between control and the incidence of hypoxia: Chi square test, p=0.037. There were more hypotensive episodes in the TCI group but not achieving statistical significance: Chi square test for association X2(1) = 0.962, p=0.327.The time to recovery between the two groups was comparable, with 18.84 ± 10.76 minutes in the bolus group and 19.72 ± 9.27 minutes in the TCI group; no statistically significant difference was shown: Student's t-test, p=0.0564.
Conclusion: TCI of propofol was associated with fewer episodes of hypoxia compared to intermittent bolus administration. Similar hemodynamic profiles and comparable time to recovery were demonstrated by these two sedation techniques.
Keywords: Target controlled propofol infusion; intermittent boluses; oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.
© 2019 Ndosi et al.
Similar articles
-
Target-controlled infusion of propofol versus intermittent bolus of a sedative cocktail regimen in deep sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison of cardiovascular and respiratory parameters.J Dig Dis. 2014 Jan;15(1):18-26. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12101. J Dig Dis. 2014. PMID: 24106806
-
Analysis of propofol and low-dose ketamine admixtures for adult outpatient dentoalveolar surgery: a prospective, randomized, positive-controlled clinical trial.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Mar;70(3):537-46. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.036. Epub 2011 Dec 16. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22177821 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and efficacy of target-controlled infusion versus intermittent bolus administration of propofol for sedation in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.Braz J Anesthesiol. 2023 Nov-Dec;73(6):751-757. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jul 5. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2023. PMID: 35803368 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Bispectral index as a guide for titration of propofol during procedural sedation among children.Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1666-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1979. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15930231 Review.
-
Comparison of bolus versus continuous infusion of propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis.Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Nov;33(11):1935-1943. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1370419. Epub 2017 Sep 1. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017. PMID: 28859533 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of etomidate added to propofol target-controlled infusion in bidirectional endoscopy: A randomized clinical trial.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Feb 16;17(2):100722. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i2.100722. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025. PMID: 39989856 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
NCD epidemic and sexual reproductive health issues in the infectious disease world.Afr Health Sci. 2019 Dec;19(4):i-iv. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i4.1. Afr Health Sci. 2019. PMID: 32127905 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Riphaus A, Geist C, Schrader K, Matchenko K, Wehrmann T. Intermittent manually controlled versus continuous infusion propofol for deep sedation during interventional endoscopy: A prospective randomized trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:1078–1085. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.685758. - DOI - PubMed
-
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists, author. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1004–1017. - PubMed
-
- Marsaban AHM, Sumaratih L, Pryambodho Comparison between intermittent propofol bolus techniques and target controlled infusion in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy. 2013;14:132–138.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources