Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Apr;51(8):760-769.
doi: 10.1111/apt.15642. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

Randomised clinical trial: transabdominal interferential electrical stimulation vs sham stimulation in women with functional constipation

Judith S Moore  1 , Peter R Gibson  1 , Rebecca E Burgell  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomised clinical trial: transabdominal interferential electrical stimulation vs sham stimulation in women with functional constipation

Judith S Moore et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Managing chronic constipation is challenging as patients frequently remain dissatisfied with laxative treatments. Novel studies using transabdominal electrical interferential therapy in children have shown benefit but there are inadequate adult studies.

Aim: To examine the effects of transabdominal interferential stimulation on bowel symptoms and quality of life in women with refractory constipation.

Methods: In a single-blind, randomised, sham-controlled pilot study, women aged ≥18 years with refractory constipation were randomised to receive interferential stimulation (with crossing of electric currents) or a novel sham stimulation (with no crossing of currents) for 1 hour a day for 6 weeks. Primary outcome was the number of patients with ≥3 spontaneous bowel movements/week. Secondary endpoints included change in PAC-SYM (Patient Assessment of Constipation-SYMptoms), PAC-QOL (Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life) and an overall symptom severity score (measured at baseline, mid time point of stimulation, end of treatment and 3 months after cessation of treatment).

Results: Interferential therapy (n = 17) met the primary outcome in 9(53%) compared with 2(12%) with sham therapy (n = 16) (P = 0.02). Interferential therapy resulted in reductions in PAC-SYM (P = 0.03) and overall symptom scores (P = 0.05). Laxative use more than halved in 66% with interferential therapy compared with 14% with sham therapy (P = 0.01). Significant improvements in symptom outcomes were maintained at 3 months. There were no treatment-related adverse effects.

Conclusion: Transabdominal interferential electrical stimulation is effective in reducing constipation in adult women. Three months after therapy, response is maintained and quality of life improved. Not allowing currents to cross intra-abdominally was an effective placebo. (Australianclinicaltrials.gov.au ACTRN12614000736640).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Riss S, Weiser FA, Schwameis K, Mittlbock M, Stift A. Haemorrhoids, constipation and faecal incontinence: is there any relationship? Colorect Dis. 2011;13:e227-e233.
    1. Lacy BE, Levenick J, Crowell M. Recent advances in the management of difficult constipation. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2012;14:306-312.
    1. Van Wunnik BP, Baeten CG, Southwell BR. Neuromodulation for constipation: sacral and transcutaneous stimulation. Best Prac Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;25:181-191.
    1. Kamm MA, Dudding TC, Melenhorst J, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for intractable constipation. Gut. 2010;59:333-340.
    1. Leong LC, Yik YI, Catto-Smith AG, Robertson VJ, Hutson JM, Southwell BR. Long-term effects of transabdominal electrical stimulation in treating children with slow-transit constipation. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:2309-2312.

Publication types