Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan;13(1):45-62.
doi: 10.1111/tops.12494. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

Infants' Goal Prediction for Simple Action Events: The Role of Experience and Agency Cues

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Infants' Goal Prediction for Simple Action Events: The Role of Experience and Agency Cues

Birgit Elsner et al. Top Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Looking times and gaze behavior indicate that infants can predict the goal state of an observed simple action event (e.g., object-directed grasping) already in the first year of life. The present paper mainly focuses on infants' predictive gaze-shifts toward the goal of an ongoing action. For this, infants need to generate a forward model of the to-be-obtained goal state and to disengage their gaze from the moving agent at a time when information about the action event is still incomplete. By about 6 months of age, infants show goal-predictive gaze-shifts, but mainly for familiar actions that they can perform themselves (e.g., grasping) and for familiar agents (e.g., a human hand). Therefore, some theoretical models have highlighted close relations between infants' ability for action-goal prediction and their motor development and/or emerging action experience. Recent research indicates that infants can also predict action goals of familiar simple actions performed by non-human agents (e.g., object-directed grasping by a mechanical claw) when these agents display agency cues, such as self-propelled movement, equifinality of goal approach, or production of a salient action effect. This paper provides a review on relevant findings and theoretical models, and proposes that the impacts of action experience and of agency cues can be explained from an action-event perspective. In particular, infants' goal-predictive gaze-shifts are seen as resulting from an interplay between bottom-up processing of perceptual information and top-down influences exerted by event schemata that store information about previously executed or observed actions.

Keywords: Action events; Eye tracking; Feedforward processes; Infant action-goal prediction; Infant gaze behavior; Perception of agency cues.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adam, M., & Elsner, B. (2018). Action effects foster 11-month-olds’ prediction of action goals for a non-human agent. Infant Behavior and Development, 53, 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.09.002
    1. Adam, M., Reitenbach, I., & Elsner, B. (2017). Agency-cues and 11-month-olds’ and adults’ anticipation of action goals. Cognitive Development, 43, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.02.008
    1. Adam, M., Reitenbach, I., Papenmeier, F., Gredebäck, G., Elsner, C., & Elsner, B. (2016). Goal saliency boosts infants’ action predictions for human manual actions, but not for mechanical claws. Infant Behavior and Development, 44, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.05.001
    1. Ambrosini, E., Costantini, M., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). Grasping with the eyes. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106, 1437-1442. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00118.2011
    1. Ambrosini, E., Reddy, V., de Looper, A., Costantini, M., Lopez, B., & Sinigaglia, C. (2013). Looking ahead: Anticipatory gaze and motor ability in infancy. PLoS ONE, 8, e67916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067916

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources