Minimally invasive versus standard endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal stones: a retrospective pilot study analysis
- PMID: 32130621
- DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02433-x
Minimally invasive versus standard endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal stones: a retrospective pilot study analysis
Abstract
Purpose: The effect of combining miniaturization with endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) is unclear. Thus, we compared the treatment outcomes between minimally invasive ECIRS (mini-ECIRS) using 16.5 Fr percutaneous access sheath and standard ECIRS using 24 Fr access sheath for renal stones MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent single session mini or standard-ECIRS in the modified Valdivia position for renal stones between April 2009 and May 2016. To adjust for patient characteristics, 77 pairs were matched using preoperative parameters including age, sex, history of febrile urinary tract infection (UTI), stone surface area, number of involved calyces, and staghorn calculi.
Results: The stone free rate (SFR) was similar between mini and standard ECIRS according to non-contrast computed tomography (61.1% vs. 52.0%, p = 0.388). The rate of perioperative complications exceeding grade 2 based on the Clavien-Dindo classification was similar in both groups (19.5% vs. 26.0%, p = 0.442). Severe complications exceeding grade 3 were also similar in both groups (2.6% vs. 3.9%, p > 0.99). Two cases of septic shock were noted in each group. Although there was no difference regarding bleeding-related complications (2.6% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.442), pseudoaneurysm or blood transfusion was not observed in the mini-ECIRS group. Pain visual analog scale values in the perioperative period were lower in the mini-ECIRS group (1.34 ± 1.08 vs. 1.69 ± 1.23, p = 0.062).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that, compared to standard ECIRS, mini-ECIRS maintained SFR without increasing perioperative complications, tended to reduce postoperative pain and had a potential to reduce bleeding-related complications. This report suggests the advantages of ECIRS miniaturization for renal stones.
Keywords: Mini-ECIRS; Minimally invasive endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery; Renal stone; Urolithiasis.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of mini endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery and multitract minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy specifically for kidney staghorn stones: a single-centre experience.BMC Urol. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01030-7. BMC Urol. 2022. PMID: 35773639 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative study of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the galdakao-modified supine valdivia (GMSV) position and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex nephrolithiasis: a retrospective single-center study.Urolithiasis. 2021 Apr;49(2):161-166. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01207-5. Epub 2020 Aug 10. Urolithiasis. 2021. PMID: 32776245
-
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for large calculi: simultaneous use of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy overcomes the disadvantageous of percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy.J Endourol. 2014 Jan;28(1):28-33. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0361. Epub 2013 Oct 24. J Endourol. 2014. PMID: 23987470
-
Invited review: the tale of ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined IntraRenal Surgery) in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position.Urolithiasis. 2018 Feb;46(1):115-123. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1015-9. Epub 2017 Nov 30. Urolithiasis. 2018. PMID: 29189885 Review.
-
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal stones: critical assessment of a randomized trial.Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Mar 29. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04445-x. Online ahead of print. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 40156645 Review.
Cited by
-
The Consecutive 200 Cases of Endoscopic-Combined Intrarenal Surgery: Comparison between Standard and Miniature Surgeries.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 8;59(11):1971. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111971. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 38004020 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery: best practices and future perspectives.Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Nov-Dec;50(6):714-726. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9921. Int Braz J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39226443 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Summary of the clinical practice guideline for the management of urinary stones, third edition.Int J Urol. 2025 May;32(5):462-474. doi: 10.1111/iju.70004. Epub 2025 Feb 10. Int J Urol. 2025. PMID: 39930597 Free PMC article.
-
Nonpapillary prone endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: effectiveness, safety and tips, and tricks.World J Urol. 2022 Dec;40(12):3067-3074. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04178-x. Epub 2022 Oct 17. World J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36251056 Free PMC article.
-
The Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Adv Urol. 2022 Jul 18;2022:1716554. doi: 10.1155/2022/1716554. eCollection 2022. Adv Urol. 2022. PMID: 35898579 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous