Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;32(8):1591-1594.
doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01507-1. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

Disease or function? What matters most for self-rated health in older people depends on age

Viviane S Straatmann  1 , Davide L Vetrano  1   2   3 , Laura Fratiglioni  1   4 , Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga  5
Affiliations

Disease or function? What matters most for self-rated health in older people depends on age

Viviane S Straatmann et al. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Self-rated health (SRH) holistically captures older adults' health status from the perspective of the individual.

Aims: To explore the accuracy of five objective health indicators related to diseases, physical function, cognition and disability in discriminating SRH among the youngest and oldest old.

Methods: We used baseline data from 2196 participants of the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K), Sweden (years 2001-2004). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were obtained from logistic regressions adjusted by sex, age and education.

Results: Among the youngest old, having ≥ 4 chronic diseases showed the highest discriminatory capacity of poor versus good SRH (AUROC: 0.714). Among the oldest old, a walking speed < 1.0 m/s showed the highest discriminatory capacity of poor versus good SRH (AUROC: 0.683), followed by ≥ 1 limitations in IADL (AUROC: 0.664).

Conclusion: What matters most for SRH in older people depends on age, with walking speed playing a major role among the oldest old.

Keywords: Chronic diseases; Disability; Functioning; Older adults; Self-rated health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Discriminatory capacity of the five objective health indicators concerning poor versus good SRH, stratified by age group. AUROC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, CD chronic diseases, WS walking speed (m/s), MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, ADL basic activities of daily living, IADL instrumental activities of daily living. All estimates derived from logistic regressions adjusted by sex, age and education
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rodriguez-Mañas L, Rodríguez-Artalejo F, Sinclair AJ. The third transition: the clinical evolution oriented to the contemporary older patient. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18:8–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.10.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beard JR, Officer A, De Carvalho IA, et al. The world report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet. 2016;387:2145–2154. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaplan G, Baron-Epel O. What lies behind the subjective evaluation of health status? Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:1669–1676. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00179-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeSalvo KB, Bloser N, Reynolds K, et al. Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:267–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00291.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jylha M, Guralnik JM, Balfour J, et al. Walking difficulty, walking speed, and age as predictors of self-rated health: the women’s health and aging study. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M609–M617. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.10.M6090. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources