Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 May;11(5):1191-1201.
doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13373. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

The value of navigation bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The value of navigation bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A meta-analysis

Simin Jiang et al. Thorac Cancer. 2020 May.

Abstract

Background: To compare the diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) with and without navigation system.

Methods: Studies dating from January 1990 to October 2019 were collected from databases. Diagnostic yield of navigation bronchoscopy and non-navigation bronchoscopy was extracted from comparative studies. Subgroup analysis was adopted to test diagnostic yield variation by lesion size, lobe location of the lesion, distance from the hilum, bronchus sign and nature of the lesion.

Results: In total, 2131 patients from 10 studies were enrolled into the study. Diagnostic yield of navigation bronchoscopy was statistically higher than non-navigation bronchoscopy for PPLs (odds ratio [OR] 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32, 2.18, P < 0.001), particularly for PPLs in the peripheral third lung (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.48, 3.44, P < 0.001) and for bronchus sign positive PPLs (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.21, 4.26, P = 0.011). Navigation bronchoscopy had better performance than non-navigation bronchoscopy when PPLs were ≤ 20 mm (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.44, 3.03, P < 0.001). It also elevated diagnostic yield of malignant PPLs (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.26, 2.22, P < 0.001) and PPLs in the bilateral upper lobes (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09, 2.08, P = 0.014).

Conclusions: Navigation bronchoscopy enhanced diagnostic yield when compared to non-navigation bronchoscopy, particularly for PPLs in the peripheral third lung, PPLs being bronchus sign positive, PPLs ≤ 20 mm, malignant PPLs and PPLs in the bilateral upper lobes.

Key points: The current study provided systematic evaluation on the diagnostic value of navigation bronchoscopy by comparing it with non-navigation bronchoscopy, and exploring the factors affecting the diagnostic yield.

Keywords: Diagnostic yield; electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB); peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs); transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB); virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study search and selection flow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of diagnostic OR of navigation bronchoscopy to non‐navigation bronchoscopy. CI, confidence interval; NB, navigation bronchoscopy; NON‐NB, non‐navigation bronchoscopy; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot. (a) Funnel plot of 10 studies included in analysis of diagnostic OR of navigation bronchoscopy to non‐navigation bronchoscopy graphed by Begg's test. (b) Funnel plot adjusted by Duval's trim and filled test. (formula image) Included studies and (formula image) filled studies.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of diagnostic OR of navigation bronchoscopy to non‐navigation bronchoscopy by lesion size.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of diagnostic OR of navigation bronchoscopy to non‐navigation bronchoscopy by the lobe location of the lesion. BLLs, bilateral lower lobes; BULs, bilateral upper lobes; RML, right middle lobe.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of diagnostic OR of navigation bronchoscopy to non‐navigation bronchoscopy by distance from the lesion to the hilum.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot of diagnostic OR of navigation bronchoscopy to non‐navigation bronchoscopy by bronchus sign.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Forest plot of diagnostic OR of navigation bronchoscopy to non‐navigation bronchoscopy by nature of the lesion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Koning HJ, Meza R, Plevritis SK et al Benefits and harms of computed tomography lung cancer screening strategies: A comparative modeling study for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160: 311–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacomelli M, Demarzo SE, Cardoso PFG, Palomino ALM, Figueiredo VR. Radial‐probe EBUS for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions. J Bras Pneumol 2016; 42: 248–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM. Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence‐based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013; 143: e142S–65S. - PubMed
    1. Bai C, Choi CM, Chu CM et al Evaluation of pulmonary nodules: Clinical practice consensus guidelines for Asia. Chest 2016; 150: 877–93. - PubMed
    1. Schreiber G, McCrory DC. Performance characteristics of different modalities for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: Summary of published evidence. Chest 2003; 123: 115S–28S. - PubMed

Publication types