The efficacy of peer assessment in objective structured clinical examinations for formative feedback: a preliminary study
- PMID: 32130851
- PMCID: PMC7066432
- DOI: 10.3946/kjme.2020.153
The efficacy of peer assessment in objective structured clinical examinations for formative feedback: a preliminary study
Abstract
Purpose: We sought to determine the impact of medical students' prior experience of assessing peers in the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) on their clinical performance.
Methods: Forty-two year 4 medical students participated in an OSCE comprised of three 10-minute stations (syncope, hemoptysis, and back pain). Each student took part in two iterations of the three-station OSCE as either the examiner or examinee, and student performance was assessed using a checklist by a medical faculty member and a student simultaneously. Students were randomly assigned to two groups and their OSCE scores were compared. Students in the control group were tested at a station first and then participated at the same station as a peer examiner, and those in the intervention group participated as a peer examiner first and then as an examinee. Moreover, student OSCE scores rated by peer examiners were compared with those awarded by faculty to evaluate the accuracy of peer assessment. Following the test, students completed surveys on their perceptions of the usefulness of this formative OSCE.
Results: Student overall OSCE scores did not differ between groups. Students in the study group performed better at the hemoptysis station (p<0.001), but poorer at the syncope station (p<0.01). Student performances at the back-pain station were similar in these two groups (p=0.48). OSCE scores rated by faculty and peer examiners were moderately negatively associated at the hemoptysis station (p<0.05), but no such association was observed at the other two stations. This trend was similar in peer examiners who were high-achievers and low-achievers in OSCEs. Students showed positive perceptions of their experience with this OSCE.
Conclusion: Student experience as peer assessor offers a feasible means of providing them greater access to OSCEs without consuming more resources, although its impact on enhancing performance in the OSCE is likely to differ across stations.
Keywords: Clinical competence; Educational measurement; Medical students.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Similar articles
-
Objectivity in subjectivity: do students' self and peer assessments correlate with examiners' subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study.BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e012289. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012289. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28487454 Free PMC article.
-
A student-initiated objective structured clinical examination as a sustainable cost-effective learning experience.Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1440111. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1440111. Med Educ Online. 2018. PMID: 29480155 Free PMC article.
-
Changing an existing OSCE to a teaching tool: the making of a teaching OSCE.Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):932. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00036. Acad Med. 2002. PMID: 12228103 Review.
-
Assessing Advanced Communication Skills via Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A Comparison of Faculty Versus Self, Peer, and Standardized Patient Assessors.Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):294-307. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1704763. Epub 2020 Mar 6. Teach Learn Med. 2020. PMID: 32141335
-
Peer assessment in the objective structured clinical examination: A scoping review.Med Teach. 2017 Jul;39(7):745-756. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1309375. Epub 2017 Apr 11. Med Teach. 2017. PMID: 28399690
Cited by
-
An Advanced Communication Skills Workshop Using Standardized Patients for Senior Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL. 2021 May 27;17:11163. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11163. MedEdPORTAL. 2021. PMID: 34124349 Free PMC article.
-
Peer Feedback: Recommendations for Behavior Analysts' Training and Supervision.Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Dec 1;16(3):696-708. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00761-1. eCollection 2023 Sep. Behav Anal Pract. 2022. PMID: 37680336 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tutor-Student Partnership in Practice OSCE to Enhance Medical Education.Med Sci Educ. 2021 Oct 6;31(6):1803-1812. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01421-9. eCollection 2021 Dec. Med Sci Educ. 2021. PMID: 34956698 Free PMC article.
-
"We Need More Practice": Evaluating the Role of Virtual Mock OSCES in the Undergraduate Programme During the COVID Pandemic.Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Feb 28;14:157-166. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S381139. eCollection 2023. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023. PMID: 36880093 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-COVID and COVID experience of objective structured clinical examination as a learning tool for post-graduate residents in Obstetrics & Gynecology-a quality improvement study.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023 Jul;66(4):316-326. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22266. Epub 2023 Apr 19. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37073604 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Khan KZ, Ramachandran S, Gaunt K, Pushkar P. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE guide no. 81. Part I: an historical and theoretical perspective. Med Teach. 2013;35(9):e1437–e1446. - PubMed
-
- Patrício MF, Julião M, Fareleira F, Carneiro AV. Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education? Med Teach. 2013;35(6):503–514. - PubMed
-
- Brannick MT, Erol-Korkmaz HT, Prewett M. A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores. Med Educ. 2011;45(12):1181–1189. - PubMed
-
- Khan R, Payne MW, Chahine S. Peer assessment in the objective structured clinical examination: a scoping review. Med Teach. 2017;39(7):745–756. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources