The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study
- PMID: 32131812
- PMCID: PMC7057472
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-1979-y
The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study
Abstract
Background: Technology for minimal access surgery is rapidly progressing in all surgical specialities including Gynaecology. As robotic surgery becomes established in increasing numbers of hospitals, there is no set curriculum for training in robotic gynaecological surgery or the assistant role in use in the UK. The purpose of this study was to determine a list of competencies that could be used as the basis of a core robotic gynaecological surgery curriculum, to explore its acceptability and the level of interest in undertaking training in robotics among obstetrics & gynaecology (O&G) trainees.
Methods: A four-round Delphi study was conducted using members and associates of British & Irish Association of Robotic Gynaecological Surgeons (BIARGS). In Round 1 respondents were asked to propose standards that could be used in the curriculum. In the following three rounds, the respondents were asked to score each of the standards according to their opinion as to the importance of the standard. Items that scored a mean of 80% or above were included in the final proposed curriculum. Following this, a national survey was conducted to explore the interest among O&G trainees in undertaking a formal robotic training for the first assistant and console surgeon roles.
Results: The items proposed were divided into three separate sections: competencies for a medical first assistant; competencies for a console surgeon; continued professional development for trained console surgeons. From the national survey; 109 responses were received of which 60% were interested in undertaking a formal training for the first assistant role, and 68% are expressing interest in training for the console surgeon role.
Conclusion: Undertaking a Delphi exercise to determine a core gynaecological robotic training curriculum has enabled consensus to be achieved from the opinions of BIARGS members/associates. There is interest among O&G trainees at all levels of training to gain experience and develop their skills in robotic surgery by undertaking a formal training in robotic surgery at both the first assistant and console surgeon level.
Keywords: Console surgeon; Gynaecological surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic-assisted surgery; Surgical training.
Conflict of interest statement
TI, NG and EM perform Da’Vinci robotic gynaecological surgery (Intuitive Surgical) and are members of the British and Irish Association of Robotic Surgeons (BIARGS), which is supported by Intuitive Surgical and other robotics/laparoscopic companies to hold education/training events. TI has done two days paid consultancy work for Medtronic. EM has been awarded a research grant from Intuitive Surgical. The authors declare no other potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Identifying curriculum content for a cross-specialty robotic-assisted surgery training program: a Delphi study.Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4786-4794. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08821-3. Epub 2021 Oct 27. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 34708292
-
Developing a Robotic General Surgery Training Curriculum: Identifying Key Elements Through a Delphi Process.J Surg Educ. 2021 Nov-Dec;78(6):e129-e136. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Aug 26. J Surg Educ. 2021. PMID: 34456170
-
Applying the Delphi process for development of a hepatopancreaticobiliary robotic surgery training curriculum.Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4233-4244. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07836-6. Epub 2020 Aug 7. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 32767146
-
Utilising the Delphi Process to Develop a Proficiency-based Progression Train-the-trainer Course for Robotic Surgery Training.Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):775-785. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.044. Epub 2019 Jan 19. Eur Urol. 2019. PMID: 30665812 Review.
-
Orsi Consensus Meeting on European Robotic Training (OCERT): Results from the First Multispecialty Consensus Meeting on Training in Robot-assisted Surgery.Eur Urol. 2020 Nov;78(5):713-716. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 21. Eur Urol. 2020. PMID: 32089358
Cited by
-
A multi-perspective qualitative study on robotic-assisted surgery training demand.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 12;15(1):29609. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13323-6. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40796759 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence in gynecology surgery: Current status, challenges, and future opportunities.Chin Med J (Engl). 2025 Mar 20;138(6):631-633. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003530. Epub 2025 Mar 3. Chin Med J (Engl). 2025. PMID: 40033743 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The case for standardising robotic curriculum globally.Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022 Jun;14(2):99-102. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.2.022. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022. PMID: 35781105 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Influence of Surgical Complexity and Center Experience on Postoperative Morbidity After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Lessons Learned from the ROBOGYN-1004 Trial.Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;31(7):4566-4575. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15265-1. Epub 2024 Apr 15. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38616209 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The current status of robotic colorectal surgery training programmes.J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):251-263. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01421-w. Epub 2022 Jun 3. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 35657506
References
-
- EARCS . First robotic rectal cancer surgery at the champalimaud clinical centre in lisbon, portugal. 2016.
-
- Einarsson JI. Is abdominal hysterectomy obsolete? 2011.
-
- C. o. G. Practice . Robotic Surgery in Gynecology. 2015.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials