Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 4;16(1):78.
doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02295-6.

The equine gastrointestinal microbiome: impacts of weight-loss

Affiliations

The equine gastrointestinal microbiome: impacts of weight-loss

Philippa K Morrison et al. BMC Vet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Obesity is an important equine welfare issue. Whilst dietary restriction is the most effective weight-loss tool, individual animals range in their weight-loss propensity. Gastrointestinal-derived bacteria play a fundamental role in host-health and have been associated with obesity and weight-loss in other species. This study evaluated the faecal microbiome (next-generation sequencing of 16S rRNA genes) of 15 obese Welsh Mountain pony mares, in the same 11-week period across 2 years (n = 8 Year 1; n = 7 Year 2). Following a 4-week acclimation period (pre-diet phase) during which time individuals were fed the same hay to maintenance (2% body mass (BM) as daily dry matter (DM) intake), animals underwent a 7-week period of dietary restriction (1% BM hay as daily DM intake). Faeces were sampled on the final 3 days of the pre-diet phase and the final 3 days of the dietary restriction phase. Bacterial communities were determined using Next Generation Sequencing of amplified V1-V2 hypervariable regions of bacterial 16S rRNA.

Results: Losses in body mass ranged from 7.11 to 11.59%. Changes in the faecal microbiome composition following weight-loss included a reduction in the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Tenericutes and a reduction in indices of bacterial diversity. Pre-diet diversity was negatively associated with weight-loss. Pre-diet faecal acetate concentration was a strong predictor of subsequent weight-loss and negatively associated with Sphaerochaeta (Spirochaetes phylum) abundance. When animals were divided into 3 groups (high, mid, low) based overall weight loss, pre-diet bacterial community structure was found to have the greatest divergence between the high and low weight-loss groups (R = 0.67, p < 0.01), following PERMANOVA and ANOSIM analysis.

Conclusions: Weight-loss in this group of ponies was associated with lower pre-diet faecal bacterial diversity and greater pre-diet acetate concentration. Overall, these data support a role for the faecal microbiome in weight-loss propensity in ponies and provide a baseline for research evaluating elements of the faecal microbiome in predicting weight-loss success in larger cohorts.

Keywords: Apparent digestibility; Biomarkers; Equine, equine obesity; Faecal microbiome; Insulin dysregulation; Volatile fatty acid; Weight-loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Co-authors PH and CB are employed by the funding organization. Co-author AD is employed by CVS Ltd. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Changes in body mass over the 7-week dietary restriction phase of the study. (A) Marginal mean plot derived predicted body mass change (n = 15). Shaded area corresponds to 95% confidence intervals. (B) Predicted cumulative proportional weight-loss for individual animals (adjusted to Week 0; n = 15)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Marginal mean plots illustrating associations between overall predicted proportional weight-loss and pre-diet diversity indices: (A) Species observed, (B) Shannon-Weiner, (C) Inverse Simpson. Shaded area corresponds to 95% CI. n = 15
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Marginal mean plots illustrating pre-diet VFA concentrations: (A) Acetate, (B) Propionate, (C) Butyrate, (D) Branched chained volatile fatty acids (BCVFA). Shaded area corresponds to 95% CI. n = 15
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Stacked histogram illustrating the relative abundance of the dominant bacterial phyla (present at > 0.05% relative abundance) before (pre-diet), and after 7 weeks of dietary restriction (post-diet; n = 15)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Stacked histogram illustrating the relative abundance of the dominant bacterial genera (present at > 0.05% relative abundance) before (pre-diet), and after 7 weeks of dietary restriction (post-diet; n = 15)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
(A) Principal Co-ordinate analysis plot of the pre-diet bacterial community from the three weight-loss groupings using Bray-Curtis similarity index. (B) Distance-based redundancy analysis illustrating associations between the pre-diet bacterial community structure and faecal volatile fatty acid concentrations (mM) and pH

References

    1. Bouter KE, van Raalte DH, Groen AK, Nieuwdorp M. Role of the gut microbiome in the pathogenesis of obesity and obesity-related metabolic dysfunction. Gastroenterology 2017;152:1671–1678. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.048. - PubMed
    1. Mathur Ruchi, Barlow Gillian M. Obesity and the microbiome. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2015;9(8):1087–1099. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.1051029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turnbaugh Peter J., Hamady Micah, Yatsunenko Tanya, Cantarel Brandi L., Duncan Alexis, Ley Ruth E., Sogin Mitchell L., Jones William J., Roe Bruce A., Affourtit Jason P., Egholm Michael, Henrissat Bernard, Heath Andrew C., Knight Rob, Gordon Jeffrey I. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature. 2008;457(7228):480–484. doi: 10.1038/nature07540. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turnbaugh Peter J., Ley Ruth E., Mahowald Michael A., Magrini Vincent, Mardis Elaine R., Gordon Jeffrey I. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1027–1031. doi: 10.1038/nature05414. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duncan S H, Lobley G E, Holtrop G, Ince J, Johnstone A M, Louis P, Flint H J. Human colonic microbiota associated with diet, obesity and weight loss. International Journal of Obesity. 2008;32(11):1720–1724. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.155. - DOI - PubMed