Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan-Mar;26(1):72-79.
doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_55_19. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

How Cancer Supportive and Palliative Care is Developed: Comparing the Policy-Making Process in Three Countries from Three Continents

Mahtab Alikhani  1 , Soudabeh Vatankhah  2 , Hasan Abolghasem Gorji  1 , Hamid Ravaghi  1
Affiliations

How Cancer Supportive and Palliative Care is Developed: Comparing the Policy-Making Process in Three Countries from Three Continents

Mahtab Alikhani et al. Indian J Palliat Care. 2020 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Background: Supportive and palliative care worldwide is recognized as one of the six main cancer control bases and plays an important role in managing the complications of cancer. Limited studies have been published in the field of this policy analysis in the world.

Aim: This study aimed to analysis the policy-making process of supportive and palliative cancer care in three countries.

Methodology: This qualitative study is a part of a comparative study. The data were collected through reviewing scientific and administrative documents, the World Health Organization website and reports, government websites, and other authoritative websites. Searches were done through texts in English and valid databases, in the period between 2000 and 2018. To investigate the policy process, heuristic stages model is implemented consisting of the four stages: agenda setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy evaluation.

Results: The findings of the study were categorized based on the conceptual model used in four areas related to the policy process, including agenda setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and evaluation of cancer palliative care policies.

Conclusion: Several factors are involved in how cancer palliative care policy is included in policy-makers' agenda, understanding a necessity, raising public awareness, and acceptance as a result of sensing the physical and nonphysical care outcomes. The stages of development, implementation, and evaluation of palliative care in countries regardless of existing differences are a function of the health system and context of each country.

Keywords: Cancer; palliative care; policy-making process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Heuristic stages model of the policy making process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Romdhane HB, Tilili F, Skhiri A, Zaman S, Phillimore P. Health system challenges of NCDs in Tunisia. Int J Public Health. 2015;60:39–46. - PubMed
    1. Mousavi SM, Haghi M, Gharasi Manshadi M. Iran's health system and readiness to meet the aging challenges. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44:1716–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Workneh MH, Bjune GA, Yimer SA. Assessment of health system challenges and opportunities for possible integration of diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis services in South-Eastern Amhara Region, Ethiopia: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nolte E, McKee M, editors. Caring for People with Chronic Conditions: A Health System Perspective. 1st ed. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2008. Paying for chronic disease care; pp. 195–221.
    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–86. - PubMed