Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;72(7):1160-1169.
doi: 10.1002/art.41243. Epub 2020 May 31.

Profibrotic Activation of Human Macrophages in Systemic Sclerosis

Affiliations

Profibrotic Activation of Human Macrophages in Systemic Sclerosis

Rajan Bhandari et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Genome-wide gene expression studies implicate macrophages as mediators of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc), but little is known about how these cells contribute to fibrotic activation in SSc. We undertook this study to characterize the activation profile of SSc monocyte-derived macrophages and assessed their interaction with SSc fibroblasts.

Methods: Plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from whole blood from SSc patients (n = 24) and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n = 12). Monocytes were cultured with autologous or allogeneic plasma to differentiate cells into macrophages. For reciprocal activation studies, macrophages were cocultured with fibroblasts using Transwell plates.

Results: The gene expression signature associated with blood-derived human SSc macrophages was enriched in SSc skin in an independent cohort and correlated with skin fibrosis. SSc macrophages expressed surface markers associated with activation and released CCL2, interleukin-6, and transforming growth factor β under basal conditions (n = 8) (P < 0.05). Differentiation of healthy donor monocytes in plasma from SSc patients conferred the immunophenotype of SSc macrophages (n = 13) (P < 0.05). Transwell experiments demonstrated that coculture of SSc macrophages with SSc fibroblasts induced fibroblast activation (n = 3) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: These data demonstrate that the activation profile of SSc macrophages is profibrotic. SSc macrophages are activated under basal conditions and release mediators and express surface markers associated with both alternative and inflammatory macrophage activation. These findings also suggest that activation of SSc macrophages arises from soluble factors in local microenvironments. These studies implicate macrophages as likely drivers of fibrosis in SSc and suggest that therapeutic targeting of these cells may be beneficial in ameliorating disease in SSc patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest:

Patricia Pioli, Monique Hinchcliff, and Michael Whitfield have received National Institutes of Health Small Business Innovative Research Grant Awards. Michael Whitfield is a scientific founder of and has received distributions from Celdara Medical LLC.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. The gene expression signature of blood-derived SSc macrophages is significantly enriched in SSc skin.
Monocytes were isolated from peripheral blood of SSc patients or healthy age and gender-matched controls and differentiated in autologous plasma for 7 days. RNA was extracted and analyzed by DNA microarray (1A) to generate the gene expression signature enriched in SSc macrophages (371 genes, FDR<10%) that was used to interrogate an independent cohort. The gene expression signature of SSc blood-derived macrophages was found to be significantly enriched in the skin of dcSSc and lcSSc patients (1B) relative to healthy controls and in the inflammatory molecular subset (1C).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Immunophenotypic characterization of SSc macrophages.
SSc patient or control monocytes were differentiated in autologous plasma for 7 days and stimulated or not with 10 ng/ml LPS for 24 hours. RNA was extracted and analyzed by qRT-PCR for mRNA cytokine levels (2A); supernatants were collected and analyzed by ELISA for secreted protein production (2B). Supernatants were collected from healthy control or SSc macrophage/fibroblast co-cultures (or monocultures, as indicated), and secreted TGF-β1 levels were measured by ELISA (2C). mRNA levels of TGF-β receptors (2D) or macrophage activation markers (2E) were quantified by qRT-PCR. Surface marker expression was quantified using flow cytometry and is presented in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) units (2F). Gating of positively stained cells was determined by FMO controls. n=7 controls and 8 SSc patients, p<0.05
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. STAT3 is phosphorylated in dcSSc macrophages under basal conditions.
dcSSc or control monocytes were differentiated with autologous plasma for five days, washed, and cultured in fresh media in the absence of plasma for an additional day in the presence of blocking anti-IL-6 or isotype control antibody. Whole cell lysates were prepared and analyzed using a phospho-STAT3 ELISA. Total STAT3 levels were not significantly different between healthy control and dcSSc macrophages (not shown). Data are plotted as absorbance units (450 nM). Data are representative of results obtained with 4 healthy controls and 4 dcSSc patients, p<0.05
Figure 4:
Figure 4:. Differentiation of healthy cells in SSc plasma confers SSc macrophage activation.
Healthy donor monocytes (Control) were differentiated in autologous (CP) or SSc patient plasma (SScP) for 7 days, and SSc patient monocytes (SSc) were differentiated in autologous (SScP) or healthy donor (CP) plasma, as indicated. Macrophages were immunophenotyped using flow cytometry (4A), qRT-PCR (4B) and by ELISA (4C). n=3 control and 3 SSc patients (4A); n=4 controls and 4 SSc patients (4B); and n=6 healthy controls and 6 SSc patients (4C), p<0.05
Figure 5:
Figure 5:. SSc plasma-differentiated macrophages activate SSc fibroblasts.
Healthy donor monocytes were differentiated in control or SSc plasma and co-cultured with SSc or control dermal fibroblasts using Transwells for 5 days (5A). RNA was extracted from fibroblasts cultured alone (monoculture) or with SSc plasma-differentiated macrophages (co-culture) and assayed for α-SMA expression by qRT-PCR (5B). RNA from monocultured or co-cultured macrophages (5C and 5D) and fibroblasts (5E and 5F) was analyzed by microarray for changes in gene expression and pathway enrichment. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments using cells derived from 3 separate controls and SSc patients, p<0.05

References

    1. Christmann RB, et al., Interferon and alternative activation of monocyte/macrophages in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension. Arthritis Rheum, 2011. 63(6): p. 1718–28. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christmann RB, et al., Association of Interferon- and transforming growth factor beta-regulated genes and macrophage activation with systemic sclerosis-related progressive lung fibrosis. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2014. 66(3): p. 714–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pendergrass SA, et al., Limited systemic sclerosis patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension show biomarkers of inflammation and vascular injury. PLoS One, 2010. 5(8): p. e12106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahoney JM, et al., Systems level analysis of systemic sclerosis shows a network of immune and profibrotic pathways connected with genetic polymorphisms. PLoS Comput Biol, 2015. 11(1): p. e1004005. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assassi S, et al., Dissecting the heterogeneity of skin gene expression patterns in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2015. 67(11): p. 3016–26. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances