Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov/Dec;36(6):529-539.
doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001610.

Reconstruction of the Orbit and Anophthalmic Socket Using the Dermis Fat Graft: A Major Review

Affiliations
Review

Reconstruction of the Orbit and Anophthalmic Socket Using the Dermis Fat Graft: A Major Review

Nina Jovanovic et al. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Nov/Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a comprehensive review of dermis fat graft (DFG) in socket reconstruction and illustrate the technical nuances and outcomes using a retrospective case review.

Methods: A literature search of 143 texts was reviewed. A retrospective case series of 34 patients following primary or secondary DFG after enucleation at a single institution (2009-2019) was performed. Clinical outcomes were statistically analyzed. Variables investigated included age, sex, race, surgical indication, muscle reattachment, complications, motility, eyelid position, prosthesis fit, and need for additional surgery.

Results: The history of DFG, use in socket reconstruction, primary and secondary indications, and surgical techniques are described. Thirty-two adults and 2 pediatric cases of DFG were reviewed; 18.75% indications were primary and 81.25% were secondary. Good eyelid position was observed in 83.3% of patients with primary DFG versus 37.5% with secondary DFG (p = 0.07). Postoperative complications occurred in 58.8% of patients, were typically mild, and resolved with minimal or no intervention. No statistically significant differences were found between occurrence of any particular complication in primary versus secondary DFG placement (p = 0.36) or between primary and secondary DFG placement and the need for additional surgery (p = 1.0). Among the 67.7% patients who had implant exposure or extrusion as an indication for DFG, 39.1% required additional surgery within 2 years. Advanced age was not associated with higher complication rates (p = 0.12).

Conclusions: DFG is an excellent option for socket reconstruction, particularly in cases involving pediatric patients, complicated orbits, history of multiple previous surgeries, and inflamed, contracted, or scarred sockets.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schmitzer S, Simionescu C, Alexandrescu C, et al. The anophthalmic socket - reconstruction options. J Med Life. 2014; 7 Spec No. 4:23–29
    1. Peer LA. The neglected free fat graft. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946). 1956; 18:233–250
    1. Loewe O. Über Hautimplantation anstelle der freien Faszienplastik. Münchener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 1913; 24:1320
    1. Guberina C, Hornblass A, Meltzer MA, et al. Autogenous dermis-fat orbital implantation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983; 101:1586–1590
    1. Hardy TG, Joshi N, Kelly MH. Orbital volume augmentation with autologous micro-fat grafts. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 23:445–449

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources