Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 3;9(3):681.
doi: 10.3390/jcm9030681.

Breast Density Notification: An Australian Perspective

Affiliations

Breast Density Notification: An Australian Perspective

Wendy V Ingman et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Breast density, also known as mammographic density, refers to white and bright regions on a mammogram. Breast density can only be assessed by mammogram and is not related to how breasts look or feel. Therefore, women will only know their breast density if they are notified by the radiologist when they have a mammogram. Breast density affects a woman's breast cancer risk and the sensitivity of a screening mammogram to detect cancer. Currently, the position of BreastScreen Australia and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists is to not notify women if they have dense breasts. However, patient advocacy organisations are lobbying for policy change. Whether or not to notify women of their breast density is a complex issue and can be framed within the context of both public health ethics and clinical ethics. Central ethical themes associated with breast density notification are equitable care, patient autonomy in decision-making, trust in health professionals, duty of care by the physician, and uncertainties around evidence relating to measurement and clinical management pathways for women with dense breasts. Legal guidance on this issue must be gained from broad legal principles found in the law of negligence and the test of materiality. We conclude a rigid legal framework for breast density notification in Australia would not be appropriate. Instead, a policy framework should be developed through engagement with all stakeholders to understand and take account of multiple perspectives and the values at stake.

Keywords: breast cancer screening; breast density; clinical ethics; duty of care; health policy; mammogram; mammographic density.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

W.V.I. receives funding from Australian NGOs National Breast Cancer Foundation and The Hospital Research Foundation for research on the biology of breast density. She has non-financial interests as a member of a national alliance of breast cancer researchers InforMD (Information Forum on Mammographic Density) who recommend development of Australian clinical guidelines for breast density notification and management (https://www.informd.org.au) and as a member of the Pink Hope Expert Advisory Committee. M.R. is a clinical consultant for Volpara and Hologic companies, both of which produce density measurement software. She is also chief medical advisor to Pink Hope. J.S. receives funding from the National Breast Cancer Foundation, Cancer Australia, and BreastScreen Australia to conduct research on the epidemiology of breast density. She is also a member of InforMD. B.R., J.M.S., D.C., and P.D. declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification system of 4 density categories: “Mostly fatty”, “Scattered density”, “Heterogeneously dense”, and “Extremely dense”. Reproduced with permission from InforMD (www.informd.org.au).

References

    1. American College of Radiology . BI-RADS® Atlas. 5th ed. American College of Radiology; Reston, VA, USA: 2017.
    1. Sprague B.L., Gangnon R., Burt V., Trentham-Dietz A., Hampton J.M., Wellman R.D., Kerlikowske K., Miglioretti D.L. Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2014;106 doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju255. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolfe J.N. Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer. 1976;37:2486–2492. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197605)37:5<2486::AID-CNCR2820370542>3.0.CO;2-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Egan R.L., Mosteller R.C. Breast cancer mammography patterns. Cancer. 1977;40:2087–2090. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197711)40:5<2087::AID-CNCR2820400516>3.0.CO;2-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hopper J.L. Odds per adjusted standard deviation: Comparing strengths of associations for risk factors measured on different scales and across diseases and populations. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2015;182:863–867. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv193. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources