Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 27;12(1):e6782.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.6782.

Comparison of Bone Turnover Markers between Young Adult Male Smokers and Nonsmokers

Affiliations

Comparison of Bone Turnover Markers between Young Adult Male Smokers and Nonsmokers

Ahmad M Al-Bashaireh et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background This study aims to compare the differences in the means of bone formation and resorption markers between young adult male smokers and nonsmokers. Methods This study employed a cross-sectional, descriptive design. Thirty-five smokers and 38 nonsmokers were recruited. All participants completed self-reported questionnaires about demographics, physical activity, and smoking status. In addition, blood specimens were collected to determine serum levels of bone turnover markers. Results Regarding bone formation markers, the least square means (LSM) for osteoprotegerin (OPG) and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) were similar for smoking and nonsmoking groups. Regarding bone resorption markers, the LSM serum carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CTXI) level was found to be significantly lower in smokers than nonsmokers [0.82 ± 0.83 vs. 1.30 ± 0.82 ng/mL, F (1, 66) = 5.73, p = 0.020]. The LSM for soluble-receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (sRANKL) [1.64 ± 0.60 vs. 1.69 ± 0.62 ng/mL, F (1,64) = 10.74, p = 0.002] and RANKL/OPG [2.62 ± 1.09 vs. 2.81 ± 1.10 ng/mL, F (1,65) = 5.88, p = 0.018] were different for smoking and nonsmoking groups. Exploration of the moderating influence of physical activity on smoking effects revealed significant effect for the interaction between smoking status and physical activity on sRANKL [F (2, 64) = 8.63, p = 0.001] and RANKL/OPG ratio [F (2, 65) = 5.49, p = 0.006]. Conclusion Our study provides evidence for the effect of smoking on bone resorption markers in young adult males. Such effects should be carefully considered side by side with other lifestyles that may lead to poor bone health and increased risk for osteoporosis.

Keywords: alcohol intake; bone; bone resorption; bone turnover; lifestyle; osteoporosis; physical activity; smoking; tobacco; young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Disorders of bone remodeling. Feng X, McDonald JM. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:121–145. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med. 1993;94:646–650. - PubMed
    1. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis‐related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. Burge R, Dawson‐Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465–475. - PubMed
    1. Current cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2005-2015. Jamal A, King BA, Neff LJ, Whitmill J, Babb SD, Graffunder CM. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6544a2.htm. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:1205–1211. - PubMed
    1. The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the surgeon general. [Apr;2019 ];https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/consequences-smoking-exec-summar... 2014

LinkOut - more resources