Reward Sensitivity, Cognitive Response Style, and Inflammatory Response to an Acute Stressor in Adolescents
- PMID: 32141010
- PMCID: PMC7483347
- DOI: 10.1007/s10964-020-01216-y
Reward Sensitivity, Cognitive Response Style, and Inflammatory Response to an Acute Stressor in Adolescents
Abstract
Inflammation is gaining support as a biological mediator between stress and many negative outcomes that have heightened risk during adolescence (e.g., mood disorders). Thus, an important line of inquiry is evaluating whether risk factors for mood psychopathology also are associated with heightened inflammatory responses to stress during this developmental period. Two prominent risk factors that interact to predict mood psychopathology are reward sensitivity and perseverative cognitive response styles, which also have been associated with heightened inflammatory proteins. These factors could influence inflammation by synergistically amplifying stress reactivity. Ninety-nine late adolescents (Mage = 18.3 years, range = 15.6-21.9 years) completed measures of reward sensitivity, cognitive response style, and blood draws before and 60-min after a modified Trier Social Stress Task to determine levels of inflammation. Higher reward drive interacted with more perseverative response style ratios (rumination relative to distraction + problem-solving) to predict larger increases in interleukin-6 (a proinflammatory protein). Follow-up analyses found that reward drive interacted with all three components of the ratio to predict change in interleukin-6. Thus, these results suggest that high reward drive and perseverative cognitive response styles are associated with increased inflammatory response to social stress in adolescents, a potential physiological mechanism linking these risk factors to mood psychopathology during this developmental period.
Keywords: Coping; Inflammation; Reward; Rumination; Stress.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest
The authors report no conflict of interests.
Figures

References
-
- Abela JRZ, Vanderbilt E, & Rochon A (2004). A test of the integration of the response styles and social support theories of depression in third and seventh grade children. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 653–674. 10.1521/jscp.23.5.653.50752 - DOI
-
- Alloy LB, Abramson LY, Walshaw PD, Keyser J, & Gerstein RK (2006). A cognitive vulnerability-stress perspective on bipolar spectrum disorders in a normative adolescent brain, cognitive, and emotional development context. Development and Psychopathology, 18(4), 1055–1103. 10.1017/S0954579406060524 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Alloy LB, Bender RE, Wagner CA, Whitehouse WG, Abramson LY, Hogan ME, Sylvia LG, & Harmon-jones E (2009). Bipolar spectrum – substance use co-occurrence: Behavioral approach system ( BAS ) sensitivity and impulsiveness as shared personality vulnerabilities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 549–565. 10.1037/a0016061 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Alloy LB, Black SK, Young ME, Goldstein KE, Shapero BG, Stange JP, Boccia AS, Matt LM, Boland EM, Moore LC, & Abramson LY (2012). Cognitive vulnerabilities and depression versus other psychopathology symptoms and diagnoses in early adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 41(5), 539–560. 10.1080/15374416.2012.703123 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical