Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;71(1):e1-e5.
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002687.

Rules Are Meant to Be Broken: Examining the "Rule of 3" for Esophageal Dilations in Pediatric Stricture Patients

Affiliations

Rules Are Meant to Be Broken: Examining the "Rule of 3" for Esophageal Dilations in Pediatric Stricture Patients

Susannah J Clark et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background and aims: The "rule of 3" is a 40-year-old expert opinion that suggests dilating an esophageal stricture more than 3 mm is unsafe. Few studies have evaluated this tenet, and do not specify how much larger than 3 mm is reasonable. Our aim was to determine the optimal point for maximum dilation diameter with acceptable risk in a pediatric population.

Methods: A retrospective review in pediatric patients with esophageal strictures was performed. The number of millimeters the stricture was dilated, defined as delta dilation diameter (ΔDD), was determined by subtracting the initial stricture diameter from the diameter of the largest balloon used. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminatory ability of ΔDD. Youden J index was used to identify optimal cut-point in predicting perforation.

Results: Two hundred eighty-four patients underwent 1384 balloon dilations. Overall perforation rate was 1.66%. There were 8 perforations in 1075 dilations with ΔDD ≤5 mm (0.7%) and 15 perforations in 309 dilations with ΔDD >5 mm (4.9%). Youden J index found an optimal cutoff to be at a ΔDD of ≤5 mm. The cumulative rate of perforation for all dilations ≤5 mm was 0.74% whereas the cumulative risk of perforation for all dilations ≥6 mm was 4.85% (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Balloon dilations that expand the initial esophageal anastomosis ≤5 mm in a pediatric population appear to not unduly increase the risk of perforation. Further prospective studies are needed to further investigate the potential for a new rule of 5 for balloon dilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Egan JV, Baron TH, et al. Standards of Practice Committee. Esophageal dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:755–760.
    1. Grooteman KV, Wong Kee Song LM, Vleggaar FP, et al. Non-adherence to the rule of 3 does not increase the risk of adverse events in esophageal dilation. Gastroint Endosc 2017; 85:332.e1–337.e1.
    1. Graham DY, Smith JL. Balloon dilatation of benign and malignant esophageal strictures: blind retrograde dilatation. Gastrointest Endosc 1985; 31:171–174.
    1. Kozarek RA, Patterson DJ, Ball TJ, et al. Esophageal dilation can be done safely using selective fluoroscopy and single dilating sessions. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995; 20:184–188.
    1. Santos AD, Thompson TR, Johnson DE, et al. Correction of esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesophageal fistula. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983; 85:229–236.

LinkOut - more resources