Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 1;21(9):1825-1839.
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa004.

Validity of Algorithms for Identification of Individuals Suffering from Chronic Noncancer Pain in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Validity of Algorithms for Identification of Individuals Suffering from Chronic Noncancer Pain in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review

Anaïs Lacasse et al. Pain Med. .

Abstract

Background: Secondary analysis of health administrative databases is indispensable to enriching our understanding of health trajectories, health care utilization, and real-world risks and benefits of drugs among large populations.

Objectives: This systematic review aimed at assessing evidence about the validity of algorithms for the identification of individuals suffering from nonarthritic chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) in administrative databases.

Methods: Studies reporting measures of diagnostic accuracy of such algorithms and published in English or French were searched in the Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AgeLine, PsycINFO, and Abstracts in Social Gerontology electronic databases without any dates of coverage restrictions up to March 1, 2018. Reference lists of included studies were also screened for additional publications.

Results: Only six studies focused on commonly studied CNCP conditions and were included in the review. Some algorithms showed a ≥60% combination of sensitivity and specificity values (back pain disorders in general, fibromyalgia, low back pain, migraine, neck/back problems studied together). Only algorithms designed to identify fibromyalgia cases reached a ≥80% combination (without replication of findings in other studies/databases).

Conclusions: In summary, the present investigation informs us about the limited amount of literature available to guide and support the use of administrative databases as valid sources of data for research on CNCP. Considering the added value of such data sources, the important research gaps identified in this innovative review provide important directions for future research. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018086402).

Keywords: Accuracy; Administrative Databases; Algorithms; Back Pain; Chronic Pain; Claims; Complex Regional Pain Syndrome; Diagnostic Codes; Fibromyalgia; Headache; Migraine; Neck Pain; Neuropathic Pain; Sensitivity; Specificity; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schneeweiss S, Avorn J.. A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58(4):323–37. - PubMed
    1. Tamblyn R, Lavoie G, Petrella L, Monette J.. The use of prescription claims databases in pharmacoepidemiological research: The accuracy and comprehensiveness of the prescription claims database in Quebec. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48(8):999–1009. - PubMed
    1. Strom BL, Kimmel SE, Hennessy S.. Pharmacoepidemiology. 5th ed.Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
    1. Bernatsky S, Lix L, O’donnell S, Lacaille D.. Consensus statements for the use of administrative health data in rheumatic disease research and surveillance. J Rheumatol 2013;40(1):66–73. - PubMed
    1. Hashimoto RE, Brodt ED, Skelly AC, Dettori JR.. Administrative database studies: Goldmine or goose chase? Evid Based Spine Care J 2014;5(2):74–6. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Grants and funding