Medical Record Documentation About Opioid Tapering: Examining Benefit-to-Harm Framework and Patient Engagement
- PMID: 32142143
- PMCID: PMC7593794
- DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz361
Medical Record Documentation About Opioid Tapering: Examining Benefit-to-Harm Framework and Patient Engagement
Abstract
Objective: Guidelines recommend that clinicians make decisions about opioid tapering for patients with chronic pain using a benefit-to-harm framework and engaging patients. Studies have not examined clinician documentation about opioid tapering using this framework.
Design and setting: Thematic and content analysis of clinician documentation about opioid tapering in patients' medical records in a large academic health system.
Methods: Medical records were reviewed for patients aged 18 or older, without cancer, who were prescribed stable doses of long-term opioid therapy between 10/2015 and 10/2016 then experienced an opioid taper (dose reduction ≥30%) between 10/2016 and 10/2017. Inductive thematic analysis of clinician documentation within six months of taper initiation was conducted to understand rationale for taper, and deductive content analysis was conducted to determine the frequencies of a priori elements of a benefit-to-harm framework.
Results: Thematic analysis of 39 patients' records revealed 1) documented rationale for tapering prominently cited potential harms of continuing opioids, rather than observed harms or lack of benefits; 2) patient engagement was variable and disagreement with tapering was prominent. Content analysis found no patients' records with explicit mention of benefit-to-harm assessments. Benefits of continuing opioids were mentioned in 56% of patients' records, observed harms were mentioned in 28%, and potential harms were mentioned in 90%.
Conclusions: In this study, documentation of opioid tapering focused on potential harms of continuing opioids, indicated variable patient engagement, and lacked a complete benefit-to-harm framework. Future initiatives should develop standardized ways of incorporating a benefit-to-harm framework and patient engagement into clinician decisions and documentation about opioid tapering.
Keywords: Chronic Pain; Clinician Documentation; Opioid Taper; Pain Management; Primary Care.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
References
-
- Chou R, Fanciullo GJ, Fine PG, Miaskowski C, Passik SD, Portenoy RK.. Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: Prediction and identification of aberrant drug-related behaviors: A review of the evidence for an American Pain Society and American Academy of Pain Medicine clinical practice guideline. J Pain 2009;10(2):131–46. - PubMed
-
- Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R.. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65(1):1–49. - PubMed
-
- US Department of Veterans Affairs: VA/DoD clinical practice guidelines: Management of opioid therapy for chronic pain. Available at: http://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/Pain/cot (accessed February 2018).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
