Hepatic vein embolization after portal vein embolization to induce additional liver hypertrophy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma
- PMID: 32144462
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06746-4
Hepatic vein embolization after portal vein embolization to induce additional liver hypertrophy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the effect of salvage hepatic vein embolization (HVE) on the volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and inadequate hypertrophy following initial portal vein embolization (PVE).
Methods: From April 2011 to October 2018, 9 patients with mCRC underwent HVE following PVE. The right or middle hepatic vein was embolized with coils and/or vascular plugs. Liver volumes were calculated at baseline, following PVE, and following HVE, in order to assess the hypertrophic effect of PVE and HVE on the FLR.
Results: Nine patients underwent HVE (n = 3, right HVE; n = 6, middle HVE) because of inadequate FLR hypertrophy following PVE. The standardized FLR increased from 0.16 (median, range 0.08-0.24) at baseline to 0.22 (median, range 0.13-0.29) following PVE (p = 0.0005) to 0.26 (median, range 0.19-0.37) following HVE (p = 0.0050). HVE was performed 40 days (median, range 19-128 days) following PVE, and assessment of FLR hypertrophy was performed 41 days (median, range 19-92 days) following HVE. Four of nine patients underwent hepatectomy; 5 patients failed to undergo hepatectomy (n = 3, inadequate hypertrophy; n = 1, disease progression; n = 1, portal hypertension). One patient required repeat HVE due to a patent accessory vein.
Conclusions: Salvage HVE is an effective technique to induce additional FLR hypertrophy in patients with mCRC and inadequate FLR after initial PVE.
Key points: • Hepatic vein embolization is effective to induce additional liver hypertrophy in surgical patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma and inadequate hypertrophy after portal vein embolization. • Increases in future liver remnant volume are feasible in patients who receive hepatotoxic neoadjuvant systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. • Sequential portal vein embolization and hepatic vein embolization can be a viable technique to induce liver hypertrophy in patients with small baseline future liver remnant volumes (< 20%).
Keywords: Colorectal neoplasms; Hepatic veins; Hypertrophy; Portal vein; Therapeutic embolization.
Similar articles
-
Resectability of bilobar liver tumours after simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization versus portal vein embolization alone: meta-analysis.BJS Open. 2022 Nov 2;6(6):zrac141. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac141. BJS Open. 2022. PMID: 36437731 Free PMC article.
-
Dragon 1 Protocol Manuscript: Training, Accreditation, Implementation and Safety Evaluation of Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization (PVE/HVE) to Accelerate Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Hypertrophy.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Sep;45(9):1391-1398. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03176-1. Epub 2022 Jul 5. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35790566 Free PMC article.
-
Study protocol of the HYPER-LIV01 trial: a multicenter phase II, prospective and randomized study comparing simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization to portal vein embolization for hypertrophy of the future liver remnant before major hepatectomy for colo-rectal liver metastases.BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07065-z. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32560632 Free PMC article.
-
Combined Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization Produces Greater Hypertrophy than Portal Vein Embolization Alone with Similar Post-Hepatectomy Outcomes and is not Impacted by Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy.Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug;32(8):5675-5683. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17287-9. Epub 2025 Apr 30. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40304945
-
Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization is better than portal embolization or ALPPS for hypertrophy of future liver remnant before major hepatectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2023 Jun;22(3):221-227. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.08.013. Epub 2022 Sep 7. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2023. PMID: 36100542
Cited by
-
Colorectal liver metastases: state-of-the-art management and surgical approaches.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Aug;407(5):1765-1778. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02496-7. Epub 2022 Apr 9. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022. PMID: 35397680 Review.
-
Surgical Management of Localized Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Times of Crisis: A Strategic Approach to Resource Utilization.J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2020 Sep 28;7:155-158. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S266681. eCollection 2020. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2020. PMID: 33062624 Free PMC article.
-
Resectability of bilobar liver tumours after simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization versus portal vein embolization alone: meta-analysis.BJS Open. 2022 Nov 2;6(6):zrac141. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac141. BJS Open. 2022. PMID: 36437731 Free PMC article.
-
Novel preoperative strategies to improve hepatocellular carcinoma resectability.Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2023 Feb 28;12(1):140-141. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-22-384. Epub 2023 Jan 16. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2023. PMID: 36860257 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A Sticky Situation: Glue Migration during Hepatic Vein Embolization.Semin Intervent Radiol. 2023 Jul 20;40(3):254-257. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769773. eCollection 2023 Jun. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37484445 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous