Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Jun;36(6):1061-1068.
doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01801-z. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

Ultrasound risk marker variability in symptomatic carotid plaque: impact on risk reclassification and association with temporal variation pattern

Affiliations
Observational Study

Ultrasound risk marker variability in symptomatic carotid plaque: impact on risk reclassification and association with temporal variation pattern

Isak Stenudd et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasound examinations of atherosclerotic carotid plaques can be used to calculate risk markers associated with plaque vulnerability. Recent studies demonstrate significant inter-frame variability in risk markers. Here, we investigate risk marker variability in symptomatic plaques and its impact on reclassification of plaque vulnerability, as well as its association with the shape of the temporal variation over the cardiac cycle.

Methods: 56 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were included in this study. 88 plaques were identified and the plaque risk markers size (area), echogenicity (gray scale median, GSM) and heterogeneity (coarseness) were measured in all frames of ultrasound B-mode image sequences. Inter-frame variability was quantified using the coefficient of variation (CV).

Results: Inter-frame variabilities of the risk markers were area CV 5-8%; GSM CV 4-7%; coarseness CV 8-15% and was in general significantly lower in large as compared to smaller plaques. The variability in GSM risk marker caused a reclassification of vulnerability in 30 to 38% of the plaques. Temporal variations in GSM with a heart rate periodic or drift/trending pattern were found in smaller plaques (< 26 mm2), whereas random pattern was found in larger plaques. In addition, hypoechoic plaques (GSM < 25) were associated with cyclic variation pattern, independent of their size.

Conclusions: Risk marker variability causes substantial reclassification of plaque vulnerability in symptomatic patients. Inter-frame variation and its temporal pattern should be considered in the design of future studies related to risk markers.

Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Plaque; Reclassification; Risk marker; Variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Examples of results from two plaques. a Longitudinal B-mode projection of the carotid with plaque, b cropped B-mode plaque images at two different time points during the image sequence, Temporal variations throughout the image sequence for c GSM, d area, e Coarseness and f Plaque Type (PT). g The power spectrum of the GSM signal (c) and the estimated Median Frequency (MDF). The sequence corresponds to about 2 s (Frame rate 20 Hz). Mean values and standard deviation (SD) were computed for each sequence for GSM, Area and Coarseness (ce) as indicated in c
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Median frequency (MDF) of the GSM variation vs plaque area. A low MDF implies heart rate cyclic or temporal drift/trend, whereas a high MDF implies random variation of the GSM. Low echogeneic plaques (GSM < 25, potentially vulnerable) had around 1–2 Hz MDF for both large and small plaques
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Illustration of reclassification based on maximum (open circle) and minimum (filled circle) values for measured gray-scale median on 57 carotid plaques. Reclassification is defined by a crossing cutoff value of 24 (solid line) (Christodoulou et al. [5]) or 32 (dotted line) (El-Barghouty et al. [20]). GSM gray-scale median

References

    1. Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, Davis SM. Stroke. Lancet. 2008;371:1612–1623. - PubMed
    1. Abbott AL, Bladin CF, Levi CR, Chambers BR. What should we do with asymptomatic carotid stenosis? Int J Stroke. 2007;2:27–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2007.00096.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nicolaides A, Beach KW, Kyriacou E, Pattichis CS, editors. Ultrasound and carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis. London: Springer; 2012.
    1. Johansson EP, Arnerlov C, Wester P. Risk of recurrent stroke before carotid endarterectomy: the ANSYSCAP study. Int J Stroke. 2013;8:220–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00790.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Christodoulou CI, Pattichis CS, Pantziaris M, Nicolaides A. Texture- based classification of atherosclerotic carotid plaques. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22:902–912. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2003.815066. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources