Efficacy of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Treating Diabetic Coronary Lesions: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study
- PMID: 32146703
- DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01273-6
Efficacy of Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Treating Diabetic Coronary Lesions: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study
Abstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) plays an important role in restenosis and late in-stent thrombosis (ST). The current study using optical coherence tomography (OCT) aims to compare target lesion neointima in patients with or without diabetes after zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) treatment.
Methods: OCT images of 90,212 struts and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in 62 patients (32 with DM and 30 without DM) with 69 de novo coronary lesions (34 DM and 35 non-DM) both after ZES implantation and 12 ± 1 month angiographic follow-up were recorded. Patient characteristics, lesion characteristics, clinical outcomes, and OCT findings including neointimal thickness, coverage, malapposition, and intimal morphology were analyzed.
Results: Baseline patient characteristics and lesion characteristics data were similar between the two groups. Higher neointimal thickness (0.14 ± 0.09 mm vs. 0.09 ± 0.04 mm, p = 0.021), more neovascularization (3.03 ± 6.24 vs. 0.52 ± 1.87, p = 0.017) and higher incidence of layered signal pattern (12.19 ± 19.91% vs. 4.28 ± 9.02%, p = 0.049) were observed in diabetic lesions comparing with non-diabetic lesions. No differences were found in malapposition, uncovered percentage, and thrombus between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Occurrence of clinical adverse events was also similar during the follow-up period (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Although more neointimal proliferation and more neovascularization were found in diabetic coronary lesions when compared with non-diabetic lesions, treatment with ZES showed similar stent malapposition rate at 1-year follow-up. The data indicated that ZES treatment could possibly be effective in treating diabetic coronary lesions.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01747356.
Keywords: Coronary artery disease; Diabetes mellitus; Optical coherence tomography; Zotarolimus-eluting stents.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation in 3 months duration of neointimal coverage after zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation by optical coherence tomography: the ENDEAVOR OCT trial.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1240-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.006. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 20129551 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of early strut coverage between zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents using optical coherence tomography.Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 1;111(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.037. Epub 2012 Oct 2. Am J Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23040589 Clinical Trial.
-
Optical coherence tomographic comparison of neointimal coverage between sirolimus- and resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents at 9 months after stent implantation.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Aug;28(6):1281-7. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9943-x. Epub 2011 Aug 21. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012. PMID: 21858655
-
Drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome - the Activity of Platelets after Inhibition and Cardiovascular Events: Optical Coherence Tomography (APICE OCT) study.EuroIntervention. 2014 Dec;10(8):916-23. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M06_10. EuroIntervention. 2014. PMID: 24974806 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical and angiographic outcomes in diabetics from the ENDEAVOR IV trial: randomized comparison of zotarolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Oct;2(10):967-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.008. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19850257 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Biosafety and efficacy evaluation of a biodegradable magnesium-based drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary artery.Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 1;11(1):7330. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86803-0. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33795781 Free PMC article.
-
Neovascularization restructuring patterns in diabetic patients with coronary in stent restenosis: an in-vivo optical coherence tomography study.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Feb;41(2):225-235. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03301-w. Epub 2024 Dec 19. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025. PMID: 39699844
References
-
- Sabate M, Cequier A, Iniguez A, et al. Everolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (EXAMINATION): 1 year results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380:1482–90. - PubMed
-
- Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cannon L, et al. Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294:1215–23. - PubMed
-
- Palmerini T, Benedetto U, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. Long-term safety of drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2496–507. - PubMed
-
- Kastrati A, Massberg S, Ndrepepa G. Is diabetes the achilles’ heel of limus-eluting stents? Circulation. 2011;124:869–72. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical