Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Sep;27(9):853-865.
doi: 10.1111/acem.13955. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Shared Decision Making for Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Shared Decision Making for Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial

Marc A Probst et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: Significant practice variation is seen in the management of syncope in the emergency department (ED). We sought to evaluate the feasibility of performing a randomized controlled trial of a shared decision making (SDM) tool for low-to-intermediate-risk syncope patients presenting to the ED.

Methods: We performed a randomized controlled trial of adults (≥30 years) with unexplained syncope who presented to an academic ED in the United States. Patients with a serious diagnosis identified in the ED were excluded. Patients were randomized, 1:1, to receive either usual care or a personalized syncope decision aid (SynDA) meant to facilitate SDM. Our primary outcome was feasibility, i.e., ability to enroll 50 patients in 24 months. Secondary outcomes included patient knowledge, involvement (measured with OPTION-5), rating of care, and clinical outcomes at 30 days post-ED visit.

Results: After screening 351 patients, we enrolled 50 participants with unexplained syncope from January 2017 to January 2019. The most common reason for exclusion was lack of clinical equipoise to justify SDM (n = 124). Patients in the SynDA arm tended to have greater patient involvement, as shown by higher OPTION-5 scores: 52/100 versus 27/100 (between-group difference = -25.4, 95% confidence interval = -13.5 to -37.3). Both groups had similar levels of clinical knowledge, ratings of care, and serious clinical outcomes at 30 days.

Conclusions: Among ED patients with unexplained syncope, a randomized controlled trial of a shared decision-making tool is feasible. Although this study was not powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes, it demonstrates feasibility, while providing key lessons and effect sizes that could inform the design of future SDM trials.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02971163.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None of the authors report any conflicts of interest relevant to this research.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
SynDA Trial Patient Flow Diagram
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
SynDA: Options for care after passing out

References

    1. Anderson TS, Thombley R, Dudley RA, Lin GA. Trends in Hospitalization, Readmission, and Diagnostic Testing of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Syncope. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;72(5):523–532 - PubMed
    1. Sun BC, Emond JA, Camargo CA Jr.. Characteristics and admission patterns of patients presenting with syncope to U.S. emergency departments, 1992-2000. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(10):1029–1034 - PubMed
    1. Probst MA, Kanzaria HK, Gbedemah M, Richardson LD, Sun BC. National trends in resource utilization associated with ED visits for syncope. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(8):998–1001. 4480060 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun BC, Emond JA, Camargo CA Jr. Direct medical costs of syncope-related hospitalizations in the United States. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(5):668–671 - PubMed
    1. Baugh CW, Sun BC, Syncope Risk Stratification Study G. Variation in diagnostic testing for older patients with syncope in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data