Environmental health perceptions in a superfund community
- PMID: 32148257
- PMCID: PMC7195873
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110151
Environmental health perceptions in a superfund community
Abstract
A disconnect between community perceptions and officially documented Superfund remedial actions and health outcomes may hinder the essential community engagement at Superfund sites. This study evaluates the extent of one such potential disconnect in Butte, Montana, which is part of the largest U.S. Superfund site in the U.S. Since the 1860s, when mining began in Butte, mine waste disposal practices in Butte and surrounding areas have left behind massive deposits that have contaminated the area's soil, sediment, groundwater and surface water with arsenic and heavy metals. Over the last four decades, a substantial amount of remediation work has been completed along with requisite community engagement and health studies at this Superfund site. The potential disconnect was evaluated using a new survey instrument that covered: (a) general environmental health perceptions, (b) mine-waste specific environmental health perceptions, (c) effectiveness of community engagement, (d) knowledge of health outcomes, and (e) demographics. The survey results demonstrated a disconnect in many instances where objective remedial improvements may not have resulted in improved environmental health perceptions in the community. The disconnect was most pronounced in the case of drinking water protection from mine waste and knowledge of health outcomes (cancer incidence rates and children's blood levels). The use of similar environmental health perception measurements may aid responsible agencies in monitoring for and addressing environmental health perception disconnects through better community engagement for the benefit of the impacted communities.
Keywords: Community engagement; Environmental health perceptions; Superfund.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Interest Statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures









References
-
- Abdi H, 2007. The Bonferroni and Sidak Corrections for Multiple Comparisons, in: Salkind NJ, Frey B (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Sage Publishing, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.
-
- Atlantic Richfield Company, 2015. Anaconda Smelter NPL Site Community Soil Operable Unit. Final Residential Soils/Dust Remedial Action Work Plan/Final Design Report (RAWP/FDR). https://semspub.epa.gov/work/08/1549208.pdf
-
- Barry SL, 2012. Coming to the surface: the environmental, health, and culture in Butte, Montana. University of Montana, Missoula, MT: Available online at https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/210
-
- Butte-Silver Bow County, Atlantic Richfield Company, 2014. Butte priority soils operable unit public health study. Prepared by ENVIRON International Corporation for Butte-Silver Bow County and Atlantic Richfield Company, Butte, MT.
-
- Butte-Silver Bow County, 2015. Community Health Profile. https://co.silverbow.mt.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/6621
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources