Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 8:2020:5824369.
doi: 10.1155/2020/5824369. eCollection 2020.

Management of Instrument Sterilization Workflow in Endodontics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Management of Instrument Sterilization Workflow in Endodontics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mario Dioguardi et al. Int J Dent. .

Abstract

Endodontic treatment consists of different working procedures, such as the isolation of the operating field, pulp chamber access, and cleaning and shaping phases with at last the need of a three-dimensional filling of the canals. Each step requires a series of single-use or sterilizable instruments. We have performed a systematic review of different sterilization and disinfection procedures aiming at drawing up a disinfection and sterilization procedure to be used on endodontic instruments. A search on PubMed and Scopus was carried out using the following keywords: "endodontic sterilization," "endodontic autoclave," "decontamination dental bur," "sterilization dental burs," and "gutta-percha points sterilization." Eligible articles were included in the qualitative and quantitative analysis. Results of the meta-analysis showed that the most effective method in sterilization is autoclaving. The qualitative analysis showed that the use of single-use or first-use instruments requires presterilization or sterilization procedures, and for reusable tools, attention must be paid to the removal of debris deposited on the blades, not easy to remove manually.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the different phases of the systematic review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Funnel plot: evaluation of heterogeneity for the first outcome (a) and for the second outcome (b).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of the fixed-effects model of the meta-analysis of the primary outcome.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of the random-effects model of the meta-analysis of the secondary outcome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Laneve E., Raddato B., Dioguardi M., et al. Sterilisation in dentistry: a review of the literature. International Journal of Dentistry. 2019;2019(9) doi: 10.1155/2019/6507286.6507286 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pedullà E., Lo Savio F., Boninelli S., et al. Torsional and cyclic fatigue resistance of a new nickel-titanium instrument manufactured by electrical discharge machining. Journal of Endodontics. 2016;42(1):156–159. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chandler N., Chellappa D. Lubrication during root canal treatment. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2019;45(1):106–110. doi: 10.1111/aej.12282. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tomson R. M. E., Polycarpou N., Tomson P. L. Contemporary obturation of the root canal system. British Dental Journal. 2014;216(6):315–322. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.205. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuang X., Chen V., Xu X. Novel approaches to the control of oral microbial biofilms. BioMed Research International. 2018;2018:13. doi: 10.1155/2018/6498932.6498932 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources