Heart Rate Responses during Simulated Fire Ground Scenarios among Full-Time Firefighters
- PMID: 32148623
- PMCID: PMC7039485
- DOI: 10.70252/FQVY7236
Heart Rate Responses during Simulated Fire Ground Scenarios among Full-Time Firefighters
Abstract
Simulated fire ground scenarios (SFGS) provide firefighters with an opportunity to maintain skills, receive feedback, and optimize performance. Although there is extensive research on heart rate (HR) changes in the firefighter population, few examine the differences between positions. Firefighters are primarily responsible for fire suppression and control (23), officers for emergency operations and organizational management, paramedics for providing on-scene emergency medical care, and drivers are responsible for driving the fire apparatus. Utilizing HR analysis to quantify the physical demands of SFGS among firefighting crews by position. Sixty-seven male (age: 38.97 ± 9.17; ht: 177.99 ± 6.45 cm. wt: 88.83 ± 13.55 kg) firefighters (FF) participated in this investigation. FF crews performed two SFGS involving the suppression and control of a structural fire. Participants were outfitted with heart rate (HR) monitors and average heart rate (HRavg) and maximum heart rate (HRmax) data were collected for each of the two SFGS. Significant differences were observed for Age (P = 0.01), APMHR (P = 0.01), HRmax1 (P = 0.04), and HRmax2 (P = 0.04) in which firefighters had higher values for Age-predicted maximal heart rate (APMHR), HRmax1, HRmax2 compared to the officers. SFGS can be very physically demanding events that may elicit maximal or near maximal HR responses regardless of position. Based on the metabolic demands of these events and the individual firefighter's capabilities, this information can be used to develop resistance training and conditioning programs that optimize performance at maximal or near maximal heart rates.
Keywords: Firefighter; SFGS; cardiovascular disease; disease risk; heart rate variability.
References
-
- Abel MG, Mortara AJ, Pettitt RW. Evaluation of circuit-training intensity for firefighters. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(10):2895–2901. - PubMed
-
- Boorady L, Barker J, Lin S, Lee YA, Cho E, PAshdown S. Exploration of firefighter bunker gear part 2: assessing the needs of the female firefighter. J Text Apparel Technol Manag. 2013;8(2):1–12.
-
- Bourdon PC, Cardinale M, Murray A, Gastin P, Kellmann M, Varley MC, Cable NT. Monitoring athlete training loads: consensus statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl 2):S2161–S2170. - PubMed
-
- Boyd L, Rogers T, Docherty D, Petersen S. Variability in performance on a work simulation test of physical fitness for firefighters. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015;40(4):364–370. - PubMed
-
- Cole CR, Foody JM, Blackstone EH, Lauer MS. Heart rate recovery after submaximal exercise testing as a predictor of mortality in a cardiovascularly healthy cohort. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(7):552–555. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources