Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 21:2020:9295852.
doi: 10.1155/2020/9295852. eCollection 2020.

Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization in Hepatic Surgery: A Review about the Embolic Materials and Their Effects on Liver Regeneration and Outcome

Affiliations
Review

Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization in Hepatic Surgery: A Review about the Embolic Materials and Their Effects on Liver Regeneration and Outcome

Jose Hugo M Luz et al. Radiol Res Pract. .

Abstract

Liver volume and function after hepatectomies are directly correlated to postoperative complications and mortality. Consequently contemporary liver surgery has focused on reaching an adequate future liver remnant so as to diminish postoperative morbidity and mortality. Portal vein embolization has evolved and is the standard of care as a liver regenerative strategy in many surgery departments worldwide before major liver resections. Different embolic materials have been used for portal vein embolization including gelfoam, ethanol, polyvinyl-alcohol particles, calibrated microspheres, central vascular plugs, coils, n-butyl-cyanoacrylate glue, fibrin glue, polidocanol-foam, alcoholic prolamin solution, and ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer, as sole occluders or in varied combinations. While to date there has been no prospective controlled trial comparing the efficacy of different embolic materials in portal vein embolization, retrospective data insinuates that the use of n-butyl-cyanoacrylate and absolute ethanol produces higher contralateral liver hypertrophies. In this review, we evaluated publications up to August 2019 to assess the technical and regenerative results of portal vein embolization accomplished with different embolic materials. Special attention was given to specific aspects, advantages, and drawbacks of each embolic agent used for portal vein embolization, its liver regenerative performance, and its influence on patient outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Final portography aspect after portal vein embolization with NBCA accomplished through a contralateral portal vein access.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Final portography aspect after portal vein embolization with PVA plus coils accomplished through an ipsilateral portal vein access.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Portal vein embolization accomplished with PVA plus coils. Fluoroscopy image shows the first coil (a) and the last coil (b) deployed in a right portal vein embolization.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Portal vein embolization accomplished with NBCA and lipiodol with a 1:5 ratio. The green arrow shows the liver tract embolization from the ipsilateral approach.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a and b). Catheter used for portal vein embolization with absolute alcohol. This 5 French catheter has an end hole for ethanol administration, a side hole for contrast flushing, and an in-between balloon to prevent alcohol reflux (reprinted with permission from the American Journal of Roentgenology). (c). The triple lumen catheter (white arrow heads) with the balloon inflated is placed in the right portal vein. The black arrows refer to a nasobiliary drain. (d). Portography with the balloon inflated shows the anterior sectorial branch, which was embolized with absolute alcohol through the end hole (reprinted with permission from the American Journal of Roentgenology).
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Computed tomography in the portal venous phase acquired before portal vein embolization shows a small left liver (future liver remnant circled in black line). (b) Computed tomography in the portal venous phase shows a significant increase in the left liver (future liver remnant circled in black line) 28 days after portal vein embolization with NBCA.

References

    1. Chen T. S., Chen P. S. The myth of Prometheus and the liver. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1994;87(12):754–755. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rous P., Larimore L. D. Relation of the portal blood to liver maintenance: a demonstration of liver atrophy conditional on compensation. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1920;31(5):609–632. doi: 10.1084/jem.31.5.609. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schindl M. J., Redhead D. N., Fearon K. C., Garden O. J., Wigmore S. J. The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection. Gut. 2005;54(2):289–296. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.046524. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pamecha V., Glantzounis G., Davies N., Fusai G., Sharma D., Davidson B. Long-term survival and disease recurrence following portal vein embolisation prior to major hepatectomy for colorectal metastases. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2009;16(5):1202–1207. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0269-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdalla E. K., Barnett C. C., Doherty D., Curley S. A., Vauthey J. N. Extended hepatectomy in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies with and without preoperative portal vein embolization. Archives of Surgery. 2002;137(6):675–680. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.6.675. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources