Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 18:2020:2128473.
doi: 10.1155/2020/2128473. eCollection 2020.

Assessment of Nitrofurantoin as an Experimental Intracanal Medicament in Endodontics

Affiliations

Assessment of Nitrofurantoin as an Experimental Intracanal Medicament in Endodontics

Mewan Salahalddin A Alrahman et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

Background and Objectives. Multiple antibacterial agents have been mixed and used as an intracanal medicament-like modified triple antibiotic paste (MTAP) to eliminate Enterococcus faecalis (EF), which has been most frequently identified in the cases of failed root canal treatment and periapical lesions. This study is aimed at using a single antibacterial agent, nitrofurantoin (Nit), as an experimental intracanal medicament paste against different clinical isolates of EF), which has been most frequently identified in the cases of failed root canal treatment and periapical lesions. This study is aimed at using a single antibacterial agent, nitrofurantoin (Nit), as an experimental intracanal medicament paste against different clinical isolates of Materials and Methods. Three strains of EF), which has been most frequently identified in the cases of failed root canal treatment and periapical lesions. This study is aimed at using a single antibacterial agent, nitrofurantoin (Nit), as an experimental intracanal medicament paste against different clinical isolates of n = 90), group M (MTAP) (n = 90), group M (MTAP) (n = 90), group M (MTAP) (EF), which has been most frequently identified in the cases of failed root canal treatment and periapical lesions. This study is aimed at using a single antibacterial agent, nitrofurantoin (Nit), as an experimental intracanal medicament paste against different clinical isolates of n = 90), group M (MTAP) (n = 90), group M (MTAP) (n = 90), group M (MTAP) (EF), which has been most frequently identified in the cases of failed root canal treatment and periapical lesions. This study is aimed at using a single antibacterial agent, nitrofurantoin (Nit), as an experimental intracanal medicament paste against different clinical isolates of.

Results: Nit could eradicate S1, S2, and S3 completely with concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, and 25 mg/mL, respectively, while MTAP showed complete eradication of the three strains only at 25 mg/mL. In all the groups, it was found that the CFU counts of EF), which has been most frequently identified in the cases of failed root canal treatment and periapical lesions. This study is aimed at using a single antibacterial agent, nitrofurantoin (Nit), as an experimental intracanal medicament paste against different clinical isolates of.

Conclusion: At the concentration of 25 mg/mL, the Nit paste is effective in eradicating EF completely when it is used as an intracanal medicament.EF), which has been most frequently identified in the cases of failed root canal treatment and periapical lesions. This study is aimed at using a single antibacterial agent, nitrofurantoin (Nit), as an experimental intracanal medicament paste against different clinical isolates of.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The isolated three strains of Enterococcus faecalis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart showing the distribution of the roots among the groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Application of nitrofurantoin paste to the samples.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Application of MTAP to the samples.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Incubation of dentin chips harvested from the samples.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nair P. N. R., Sjögren U., Figdor D., Sundqvist G. Persistent periapical radiolucencies of root-filled human teeth, failed endodontic treatments, and periapical scars. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 1999;87(5):617–627. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70145-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fabricius L., Dahlen G., Holm S. E., Moller A. J. Influence of combinations of oral bacteria on periapical tissues of monkeys. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research. 1982;90(3):200–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1982.tb00728.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sedgley C., Buck G., Appelbe O. Prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis at multiple oral sites in endodontic patients using culture and PCR. Journal of Endodontia. 2006;32(2):104–109. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rôças I. N., Hulsmann M., Siqueira J. F., Jr. Microorganisms in root canal-treated teeth from a German population. Journal of Endodontia. 2008;34(8):926–931. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang Q. Q., Zhang C. F., Chu C. H., Zhu X. F. Prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis in saliva and filled root canals of teeth associated with apical periodontitis. International Journal of Oral Science. 2012;4(1):19–23. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2012.17. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms