Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 18;5(8):3828-3838.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02688. eCollection 2020 Mar 3.

ZnO-Modified g-C3N4: A Potential Photocatalyst for Environmental Application

Devina Rattan Paul  1 , Shubham Gautam  2 , Priyanka Panchal  1 , Satya Pal Nehra  1 , Pratibha Choudhary  3 , Anshu Sharma  4
Affiliations

ZnO-Modified g-C3N4: A Potential Photocatalyst for Environmental Application

Devina Rattan Paul et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

Solar energy-driven practices using semiconducting materials is an ideal approach toward wastewater remediation. In order to attain a superior photocatalyst, a composite of g-C3N4 and ZnO (GCN-ZnO) has been prepared by one-step thermal polymerization of urea and zinc carbonate basic dihydrate [ZnNO3]2·[Zn(OH)2]3. The GCN-ZnO0.4 sample showed an evolved morphology, increased surface area (116 m2 g-1), better visible light absorption ability, and reduced band gap in comparison to GCN-pure. The GCN-ZnO0.4 sample also showed enhanced adsorption and photocatalytic activity performance, resulting in an increased reaction rate value up to 3 times that of GCN-pure, which was attributed to the phenomenon of better separation of photogenerated charge carriers resulting because of heterojunction development among interfaces of GCN-pure and ZnO. In addition, the GCN-ZnO0.4 sample showed a decent stability for four cyclic runs and established its potential use for abatement of organic wastewater pollutants in comparison to GCN-pure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
XRD patterns of GCN–pure, ZnO, and synthesised GCN–ZnOx samples.
Figure 2
Figure 2
FTIR spectra of (a) ZnO, (b) GCN pure, (c) GCN–ZnO0.2, (d) GCN–ZnO0.4, and (e) GCN–ZnO0.6.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a,b) SEM images and (c,d) HR-TEM images of GCN–pure and GCN–ZnO0.4.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a,d) SEM image, (b,e) elemental mapping, and (c,f) EDX spectra of GCN–pure and GCN–ZnO0.4.
Figure 5
Figure 5
XPS spectrum of (a) GCNZn0.04 with the elemental composition shown in the inset and short scan for (b) C 1s, (c) N 1s, (d) O 1s, and (e) Zn 2p.
Figure 6
Figure 6
TGA curves of (a) GCN–ZnO0.2, (b) GCN–ZnO0.4, (c) GCN–ZnO0.6, (d) GCN–pure, and (e) ZnO.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm of (a) GCN–ZnO0.4 and (b) GCN–pure. (c) BET adsorption isotherm of GCN–ZnO0.4 and GCN–pure.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) UV–vis diffused absorbance spectra and (b) band gaps of ZnO, GCN–pure, and GCN–ZnOx samples.
Figure 9
Figure 9
(a) Comparison of photocatalytic activity. (b) ln(C0/C(t)) for MB degradation as a function of visible light irradiation time for GCN–ZnOx samples, GCN–pure, and ZnO.
Figure 10
Figure 10
UV–vis absorbance spectra of MB dye using (a) GCN–ZnO0.2, (b) GCN–ZnO0.4, (c) GCN–ZnO0.6, (d) GCN–pure, and (e) ZnO.
Figure 11
Figure 11
(a) Comparison of the degradation efficiency. (b) ln(C0/C(t)) as a function of visible light irradiation time for MB degradation under different pH conditions using GCN–ZnO0.4. (c) Relation between the surface zeta potential value of GCN–ZnO0.4 and the degradation percentage of the MB dye at different pH values. (d) Zeta potential of GCN–ZnO0.4 at different pH values.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Recyclability experiment of photocatalytic degradation of MB dye using the GCN–ZnO0.4 sample.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Influence of hole, electron, •OH, and O2•– scavengers on the degradation of MB dye after 120 min of visible light irradiation.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Proposed photocatalytic mechanism showing the separation and transfer of photogenerated electron–hole pairs over the GCN–ZnO photocatalyst under visible light irradiation.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Schematic illustration of the synthesis of GCN–ZnOx samples.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Patsoura A.; Kondarides D. I.; Verykios X. E. Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants with simultaneous production of hydrogen. Catal. Today 2007, 124, 94–102. 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.03.028. - DOI
    1. Fageria P.; Gangopadhyay S.; Pande S. Synthesis of ZnO/Au and ZnO/Ag nanoparticles and their photocatalytic application using UV and visible light. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 24962–24972. 10.1039/c4ra03158j. - DOI
    1. Panchal P.; Paul D. R.; Sharma A.; Hooda D.; Yadav R.; Meena P.; Nehra S. P. Phytoextract mediated ZnO/MgO nanocomposites for photocatalytic and antibacterial activities. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2019, 385, 112049.10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112049. - DOI
    1. Paul D. R.; Sharma R.; Panchal P.; Malik R.; Sharma A.; Tomer V. K.; Nehra S. P. Silver doped graphitic carbon nitride for the enhanced photocatalytic activity towards organic dyes. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2019, 19, 5241–5248. 10.1166/jnn.2019.16838. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Safaei J.; Mohamed N. A.; Mohamad Noh M. F.; Soh M. F.; Ludin N. A.; Ibrahim M. A.; Roslam Wan Isahak W. N.; Mat Teridi M. A. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) electrodes for energy conversion and storage: a review on photoelectrochemical water splitting, solar cells and supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 22346.10.1039/c8ta08001a. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources