Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;204(3):503-510.
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001012. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

Optimal Timing of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy

Affiliations

Optimal Timing of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy

Henk B Luiting et al. J Urol. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: We developed a model predicting the probability of detecting prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa on prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively included 419 consecutive patients with biochemical recurrence (prostate specific antigen less than 2.0 ng/ml) after radical prostatectomy who underwent 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography/computerized tomography to guide salvage therapy. Patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy between radical prostatectomy and prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography were excluded from the study. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors for the detection of prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa on prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. We minimized overfitting of the model and used decision curve analysis to determine clinical utility.

Results: Median prostate specific antigen at scanning was 0.40 ng/ml (IQR 0.30-0.70). Overall 174 (42%) patients had prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa. Prostate specific antigen at time of scanning, and grade group, N stage and surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy specimen were significant predictors for detecting prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa. The bootstrapped AUC of this model was 0.75 (IQR 0.73-0.77). The decision curve analysis showed a net benefit by a model based probability from 16%. Limitations include the retrospective design and the missing histological correlation of positive lesions.

Conclusions: Next to the prostate specific antigen at time of scanning, grade group, N stage and surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy specimen are significant predictors for detecting prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa on prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. The presented model is implemented in a dashboard to assist clinicians in determining the optimal time to perform 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Keywords: 68Ga-PSMA; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; recurrence; salvage therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Editorial Comment.
    Radtke JP, Hadaschik B. Radtke JP, et al. J Urol. 2020 Sep;204(3):510. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001012.01. Epub 2020 Jun 26. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 32589490 No abstract available.